HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 36/4/686    most recent 0363546507310074v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Dun, S. Articles by Andrews, J. R. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dun, S. Articles by Andrews, J. R. Related Collections Kinematics and kinetics Children and Adolescents Elbow Shoulder Baseball

A Biomechanical Comparison of Youth Baseball Pitches

Is the Curveball Potentially Harmful?

Shouchen Dun, MS^*, Jeremy Loftice, CSCS^*, Glenn S. Fleisig, PhD^*,, David Kingsley and James R. Andrews, MD^*

From the ^* American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama, and the University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Address correspondence to Glenn S. Fleisig, PhD, American Sports Medicine Institute, 833 St Vincent’s Drive, Suite 100, Birmingham, AL 35205 (e-mail: glennf{at}asmi.org).

Background: The curveball has been anecdotally considered as a dangerous pitch among youth pitchers, especially for their ulnar collateral ligaments. No biomechanical studies have been conducted among youth pitchers comparing different types of pitches.

Hypothesis: The kinetics of the baseball throw varies significantly between the fastball, curveball, and change-up for youth pitchers. Kinematic and temporal differences are also expected.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Twenty-nine youth baseball pitchers (age, 12.5 ± 1.7 years) pitched 5 fastballs, 5 curveballs, and 5 change-ups with maximum effort in an indoor laboratory setting. Data were collected with a 3-dimensional motion analysis system. Kinetic, kinematic, and temporal parameters were compared among the 3 pitches.

Results: For elbow varus torque, shoulder internal rotation torque, elbow proximal force, and shoulder proximal force, the fastball produced the greatest values, followed by the curveball and then the change-up. The fastball also produced the greatest elbow flexion torque. Shoulder horizontal adduction torque and shoulder adduction torque were the least for the change-up. Several differences in body segment position, velocity, and timing were also found.

Conclusions: In general, elbow and shoulder loads were the greatest in the fastball and least in the change-up. Kinematic and temporal differences were also found among the 3 pitch types.

Clinical Relevance: The curveball may not be more potentially harmful than the fastball for youth pitchers. This finding is consistent with recent epidemiologic research indicating that amount of pitching is a stronger risk factor than type of pitches thrown.

Key Words: shoulder • elbow • ulnar collateral ligament • kinetics • kinematics • adolescent • fastball • curveball

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Is the Curveball Dangerous for Young Pitchers? Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, June 25, 2008; 2008(625): 5 - 5. [Full Text]