AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on February 20, 2008, doi:10.1177/0363546507313089

(American Journal of Sports Medicine 2008;36:841.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (AJSM PreView[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/5/841    most recent
0363546507313089v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Lewinski, G.
Right arrow Articles by Lazovic, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von Lewinski, G.
Right arrow Articles by Lazovic, D.

Article

The Influence of Nonanatomical Insertion and Incongruence of Meniscal Transplants on the Articular Cartilage in an Ovine Model

Gabriela von Lewinski, MD, PhD1*, Dieter Kohn, MD, PhD2, Carl Joachim Wirth, MD, PhD1, Djordje Lazovic, MD, PhD3

1 Orthopaedic Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
2 Orthopaedic Department, University Homburg/Saar, Germany
3 Orthopaedic Department, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gabriela.von.lewinski{at}annastift.de.


   Abstract

Background: Adequate size matching and anatomically correct positioning must be recognized as essential factors influencing the outcome of meniscal transplantation.

Hypothesis: Nonanatomical insertion and incongruence of meniscal transplants has an influence on the development of degenerative changes.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Ten female sheep were used for this animal study. Both knees (N = 20) were divided into 3 groups, subjected to either meniscectomy (group I; n = 10), to a medial meniscal autograft transplantation with a nonanatomical insertion of the anterior and posterior horn (group II; n = 5), or a meniscal autograft transplantation from the opposite knee as an incongruent meniscal autograft (group III; n = 5). After 6 months, radiographic (Fairbank’s criteria), macroscopic (Jackson score), and histological evaluation by light microscopy (Mankin score) and scanning electron microscopy of the articular cartilage was performed.

Results: All applied evaluation methods demonstrated that nonanatomical insertion of meniscal transplants resulted in the highest amount of degenerative cartilage changes. The histological assessment even revealed a significantly enlarged cartilage damage for the non-anatomic–positioned meniscal transplants in relation to the meniscectomized knees. Furthermore, the incongruent meniscal transplants demonstrated a significantly better cartilage situation than nonanatomically inserted meniscal transplants.

Conclusion: The histological evaluation demonstrated clearly that a nonanatomically inserted meniscal transplant leads to degenerative cartilage changes that are worse than that after meniscectomy.

Clinical Relevance: Precise anatomic positioning is mandatory for the potential chondroprotective effect of meniscal transplants.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.