AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on November 30, 2007, doi:10.1177/0363546507310076

(American Journal of Sports Medicine 2008;36:545.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (AJSM PreView[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/3/545    most recent
0363546507310076v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beck, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Marcus, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beck, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Marcus, R.

Article

Do Capacitively Coupled Electric Fields Accelerate Tibial Stress Fracture Healing? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Belinda R. Beck, PhD1*, Gordon O. Matheson, MD, PhD2, Gabrielle Bergman, MD3, Tracey Norling, BHS(HM)1, Michael Fredericson, MD2, Andrew R. Hoffman, MD4, Robert Marcus, MD5

1 Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
2 Stanford University, Stanford, California
3 Franklin & Seidelmann Virtual Radiologists, Chagrin Falls, Ohio
4 Stanford University, Stanford, California, and VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
5 Stanford University, Stanford, California, and Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, Indiana

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: b.beck{at}griffith.edu.au.


   Abstract

Background: Tibial stress fractures increasingly affect athletes and military recruits, with few known effective management options. Electrical stimulation enhances regular fracture healing, but the effect on stress fractures has not been definitively tested.

Hypothesis: Capacitively coupled electric field stimulation will accelerate tibial stress fracture healing.

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: Twenty men and 24 women with acute posteromedial tibial stress fractures were referred from local clinicians. Subjects were randomly assigned active or placebo capacitively coupled electric field stimulation to be applied for 15 hours per day until healed, given supplemental calcium, and instructed to rest from provocative training. Healing was confirmed when hopping to 10 cm for 30 seconds could be achieved without pain.

Results: No difference in time to healing was detected between treatment and placebo groups. Women in the treatment group healed more slowly than did the men (P = .05). Superior treatment compliance was associated with reduced time to healing (P = .003). Rest noncompliance was associated with increased time to healing (P = .05).

Conclusion: Whole-group analysis did not detect an effect of capacitively coupled electric field stimulation on tibial stress fracture healing; however, greater device use and less weightbearing loading enhanced the effectiveness of the active device. More severe stress fractures healed more quickly with capacitively coupled electric field stimulation.

Clinical Relevance: Although the use of capacitively coupled electric field stimulation for tibial stress fracture healing may not be efficacious for all, it may be indicated for the more severely injured or elite athlete/recruit whose incentive to return to activity may motivate superior compliance.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.