AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on February 22, 2007, doi:10.1177/0363546506298110

(American Journal of Sports Medicine 2007;35:936.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (AJSM PreView[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/6/936    most recent
0363546506298110v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sonoda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moriya, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sonoda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moriya, H.

Article

Correlation Between Knee Laxity and Graft Appearance on Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Double-Bundle Hamstring Graft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Masaki Sonoda, MD, PhD1*, Tsuguo Morikawa, MD, PhD1, Kan Tsuchiya, MD, PhD1, Hideshige Moriya, MD, PhD2

1 Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, JFE Kawatetsu Hospital, Chiba, Japan
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: msonoda{at}kch.chuo.chiba.jp.


   Abstract

Background: In recent years, double-bundle (anteromedial bundle [AMB], posterolateral bundle [PLB]) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has developed into an accepted practical surgical procedure; therefore, its efficacy needs to be established.

Hypothesis: Multiple-sliced 2-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging allows evaluation of each bundle separately. Both bundles are important for knee stability, and each bundle has a role in the prevention of knee instability. Knee laxity testing will correlate with the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the individual graft bundles.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: A total of 97 double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions were evaluated 1 year after surgery, including side-to-side difference of KT-2000 arthrometer and pivot shift test. T2-weighted 2-dimensional magnetic resonance images were captured in the middle plane of each bundle to express magnetic resonance signals of each bundle. The magnetic resonance signals were divided into 3 grades: grade I, low-intensity signal; grade II, high-intensity signal within 50%; and grade III, high-intensity signal greater than 50%.

Results: Anterior laxity in AMB grade II (PLB I, 3.5 ± 1.7 mm; PLB II, 4.5 ± 1.9 mm) was significantly larger than in AMB grade I (PLB I, 1.9 ± 1.7 mm; PLB II, 2.1 ± 1.7 mm) with statistical difference (P = .025 in PLB I; P = .002 in PLB II). A positive rate in pivot shift test in PLB II (48%) was significantly larger than in PLB I (21%) with statistical difference (P = .031).

Conclusions: Varying magnetic resonance signals according to the bundle indicate role differences of each bundle in knee stability. These results imply that the AMB has a major role in preventing anterior translation of the tibia and the PLB has a major role in preventing anterolateral rotatory instability.

Key Words: anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), double-bundle reconstruction, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.