AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on January 11, 2007, doi:10.1177/0363546506295181

(American Journal of Sports Medicine 2007;35:637.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (AJSM PreView[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/4/637    most recent
0363546506295181v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pedowitz, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pedowitz, R.

Article

Biomechanical Analysis of Femoral Tunnel Pull-out Angles for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bioabsorbable and Metal Interference Screws

Alan L. Zhang1, Yuri M. Lewicky, MD1, Richard Oka2, Andrew Mahar, MS3*, Robert Pedowitz, MD, PhD1

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California at San Diego
2 Orthopedic Biomechanics Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, Children’s Hospital-San Diego, California
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California at San Diego; Orthopedic Biomechanics Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, Children’s Hospital-San Diego, California

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: amahar{at}chsd.org.


   Abstract

Background: Fixation strength of metal and bioabsorbable interference screws has not been evaluated while varying the anterior cruciate ligament graft tension angle.

Hypothesis: There is no difference in fixation strength between 2 types of interference screws for anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation while the graft tension angle is varied relative to the femoral tunnel.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Forty-eight anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions were performed using immature porcine femurs stripped of soft tissue and doubled-over porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendon grafts. Specimens were randomized to bioabsorbable or titanium interference screw fixation. Specimens were randomized to one of three pull angles (0°, 30°, 60°) representing loading at different knee flexion angles (n = 8/group). Reconstructed ligaments were tensioned to 10 N followed by 200 loading cycles between 10 and 150 N and a final failure test. Construct elongation (mm) at 100 and 200 cycles and failure load (N) were analyzed using a 2-way analysis of variance (P < .05).

Results: Screw material interacted significantly with graft tension angle, as the bioabsorbable screw specimens demonstrated significantly greater fixation strength when tensioned at greater angles. Specimens fixed with bioabsorbable screws showed significantly less elongation at both 100 and 200 cycles and significantly greater failure load compared with titanium screws.

Conclusion: Bioabsorbable interference screws acutely have increased fixation strength compared with titanium interference screws for anterior cruciate ligament grafts loaded at greater tension angles.

Clinical Relevance: The strength of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction fixation increases with increasing divergence between the tension angle and femoral tunnel, a condition seen when the knee approaches full extension.

Key Words: anterior cruciate ligament, reconstruction, knee flexion angle, biomechanical stability







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.