AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on January 11, 2007, doi:10.1177/0363546506294361

(American Journal of Sports Medicine 2007;35:384.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (AJSM PreView[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/3/384    most recent
0363546506294361v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maletis, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Burchette, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maletis, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Burchette, R. J.

Article

A Prospective Randomized Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of Patellar Tendon and Quadruple-Strand Semitendinosus/Gracilis Tendons Fixed With Bioabsorbable Interference Screws

Gregory B. Maletis, MD1*, Sheri L. Cameron, PA-C, MS, ATC2, Joann J. Tengan, PT1, Raoul J. Burchette, MA, MS1

1 Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Baldwin Park, California
2 Sports Medicine Oregon, Tigard, Oregon

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Gregory.b.maletis{at}kp.org.


   Abstract

Background: Debate exists regarding the optimal graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Few studies have compared the differences in outcome after reconstruction using similar fixation methods.

Hypothesis: Similar outcomes will be seen after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone or quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws.

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: Ninety-nine patients were prospectively randomized to bone-patellar tendon-bone (46 patients) or quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis (53 patients) reconstruction groups. The bone-patellar tendon-bone group had slightly lower preinjury Tegner scores (6.7 vs 7.1, P = .03); otherwise, the groups were similar. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using an endoscopic technique with bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. Patients were evaluated at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results: Forty-six bone-patellar tendon-bone and 50 quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis patients were available at 24 months (97%). No differences in International Knee Documentation Committee grade, Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, range of motion, single-legged hop test, KT-1000 arthrometer manual maximum difference, Short Form-36, or patient knee rating were found. The bone-patellar tendon-bone group had better flexion strength in the operated leg than in the nonoperated leg (102% vs 90%, P = .0001), fewer patients complaining of difficulty jumping (3% vs 17%, P = .03), and a greater number of patients returning to preinjury Tegner level (51% vs 26%, P = .01). The quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis group had better extension strength in the operated leg than in the nonoperated leg (92% vs 85%, P = .04), fewer patients with sensory deficits (14% vs 83%, P = .0001), and fewer patients with difficulty kneeling (6% vs 20%, P = .04). Both groups showed significant improvement in KT-1000 arthrometer manual maximum difference, Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, International Knee Documentation Committee grade, and patient knee rating score.

Conclusions: Good outcomes were seen in both the bone-patellar tendon-bone and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis groups. Subtle differences were noted between the groups, which may help guide optimal graft choice.

Key Words: anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), patellar tendon: hamstring tendon, ligament reconstruction, clinical trial, bioabsorbable screw




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. A. Turman and M. D. Miller
What's New in Sports Medicine
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2008; 90(1): 211 - 222.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.