|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
We evaluated metatarsal lengths from roentgenograms in a group with metatarsal stress fractures and compared them with those of a control group having no foot symptoms to determine if a short first metatarsal could be implicated as a cause for metatarsal stress fractures. By statistical analysis we showed that the lengths of the first and second metatarsals in the group with stress fractures did not differ from those in a randomly selected control group. In addition, we determined that to be "short," the first metatarsal must be less than 73% of the length of the second metatarsal, and to be "long," the first metatarsal must be more than 94% of the length of the second metatarsal.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Chuckpaiwong, C. Cook, R. Pietrobon, and J. A Nunley Second metatarsal stress fracture in sport: comparative risk factors between proximal and non-proximal locations Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2007; 41(8): 510 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Boden, D. C. Osbahr, and C. Jimenez Low-Risk Stress Fractures Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2001; 29(1): 100 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W Brown and R. C Brown Athletic injuries Trauma, October 1, 1999; 1(4): 271 - 278. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Altman Stress Fractures: Revisited The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, August 1, 1985; 105(4): 139 - 140. [Abstract] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Whiteside, S. B. Fleagle, and A. Kalenak Fractures and refractures in intercollegiate athletes: An eleven-year experience Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1981; 9(6): 369 - 377. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |