AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearl, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pearl, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, P. W.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 7:231-233 (1979)
© 1979 SAGE Publications

Neck motion in the high school football player

Observations and suggestions for diminishing stresses on the neck

Arthur J. Pearl, M.D.

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

Paul W. Mayer, M.D.

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

In a group of 40 high school athletes (height: 166.37 to 189.57 cm, average, 174.40 cm; neck circumference: 35.56 to 41.91 cm, average, 39.12 cm), the neck motions were studied in flexion and extension, clinically, radiographically, and cineoradi ographically. Flexion ranged from 34 to 84° (average 72°) and extension from 21 to 64° (average 45°) without helmet and shoulder pads. In well-fitting equipment flexion ranged from 36 to 86° (average 73°) and extension from 12 to 56° (average 34°). No correlation was determined between the size of the athlete's neck and the range of motion. The size of the athlete's neck was important in the determination of maximum stresses in the neck. The helmets impinged on the shoulder pads or interscapular region; this impingement diminished tension on the anterior portion of the cervical spine in extension. The face masks impinged on the shoulder pads in flexion of the neck; this impingement diminished stress on the posterior muscula ture. Proper fitting equipment, conditioning neck exercises, and changes in the rules of the game so that abuse of the head and neck is not encouraged are some of the aspects that may reduce the risk of injury to the cervical region in football players.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. N. Waninger
Management of the Helmeted Athlete With Suspected Cervical Spine Injury
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2004; 32(5): 1331 - 1350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. H. Leggett, J. E. Graves, M. L. Pollock, M. Shank, D. M. Carpenter, B. Holmes, and M. Fulton
Quantitative assessment and training of isometric cervical extension strength
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1991; 19(6): 653 - 659.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.