HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 36/6/1094    most recent 0363546508317412v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Google Scholar Articles by Mae, T. Articles by Fujie, H. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mae, T. Articles by Fujie, H. Related Collections Reconstruction Biomechanics Graft fixation

Optimization of Graft Fixation at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Part II: Effect of Knee Flexion Angle

Tatsuo Mae, MD, PhD^,*, Konsei Shino, MD, PhD, Ken Nakata, MD, PhD, Yukiyoshi Toritsuka, MD, PhD, Hidenori Otsubo, MD and Hiromichi Fujie, PhD^||

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan, the Faculty of Comprehensive Rehabilitation, Osaka Prefecture University, Osaka, Japan, the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Medical School, Osaka, Japan, and the^|| Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kogakuin University, Tokyo, Japan

^* Address correspondence to Tatsuo Mae, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, 3-1-69, Inabaso, Amagasaki, Hyogo, 660-8511, Japan (e-mail: ta-mae{at}umin.ac.jp).

Background: There is no consensus about flexion angle of the knee at the time of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of flexion angle at the final graft fixation on the positional relationship as well as the load between femur and tibia.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Six intact cadaveric knees were passively flexed and extended under 6 degrees of freedom with the robotic system developed in our laboratory, while their 3-dimensional paths were recorded. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed with a single-socket technique using autogenous quadrupled hamstring tendons, while the graft was fixed at 0° (group A), 20° (group B), or 90° (group C) with a constant initial tension of 44 N. The knees then repeated the same movement as before while the relative position between femur and tibia was recorded. The load in the femorotibial joint was also calculated based on the principle of superposition.

Results: Posterior displacement of the tibia compared with the normal knee was the smallest in group B at all flexion angles, while the load between tibia and femur in group B was also the smallest and the closest to the normal knee.

Conclusion: As the positional relationship as well as the load between femur and tibia in group B was the closest to that in the normal knee, 20° of flexion is the most desirable of the positions tested for graft tensioning and fixation at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Clinical Relevance: The tibia-femur position is well retained when the graft was fixed at 20° of flexion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Key Words: ACL reconstruction • flexion angle • robotic system • tibia-femur position • load in femorotibial joint