AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on January 8, 2008, doi:10.1177/0363546507311094
This version was published on April 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/4/728    most recent
0363546507311094v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prud’homme, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hipp, J. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prud’homme, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hipp, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biomechanics
Right arrow Graft fixation
Right arrow Elbow
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 36:728-732 (2008)
© 2008 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Biomechanical Analysis of Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Grafts of the Elbow

Joe Prud’homme, MD*, Jeffrey E. Budoff, MD{ddagger},{dagger}, Lyndon Nguyen, MS{ddagger} and John A. Hipp, PhD{ddagger}

From the * Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, and the {ddagger} Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

{dagger} Address correspondence to Jeffrey E. Budoff, MD, 6620 Main St, 13th Floor, Houston, TX 77401 (e-mail: jebudoff{at}yahoo.com).

Background: There are no biomechanical studies evaluating different tendon grafts for elbow medial collateral ligament reconstruction.

Hypothesis: Using a larger tendon for the graft will yield greater resistance to valgus load for medial collateral ligament docking technique reconstructions. The type of graft used for a medial collateral ligament docking technique reconstruction will have a significant effect on the resistance to valgus loads.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Cadaveric elbows from male donors were cyclically loaded to 3 and 5 mm elongation, both intact and after a docking technique medial collateral ligament reconstruction using palmaris longus, gracilis, semitendinosus, and patellar tendon grafts.

Results: There was no significant difference in load to 3 or 5 mm elongation, number of cycles to failure, or stiffness between any tendon graft studied. Every tendon graft reconstruction tested was significantly weaker and less stiff than was the native medial collateral ligament.

Conclusion: There appears to be no biomechanical advantage to be gained by using a larger tendon graft instead of a palmaris longus graft.

Clinical Relevance: The most readily available graft source with the lowest morbidity (often the palmaris longus tendon) should be used for medial collateral ligament reconstruction.

Key Words: medial collateral ligament (MCL) • reconstruction • tendon graft • elbow • docking technique






HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.