AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on March 26, 2007, doi:10.1177/0363546507300262
This version was published on August 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/8/1276    most recent
0363546507300262v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mologne, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Dewing, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mologne, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Dewing, C. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Shoulder
Right arrow Arthroscopy
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 35:1276-1283 (2007)
© 2007 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Arthroscopic Stabilization in Patients With an Inverted Pear Glenoid

Results in Patients With Bone Loss of the Anterior Glenoid

Timothy S. Mologne, MD*,{dagger}, Matthew T. Provencher, MD, LCDR, MC, USNR{dagger},{ddagger}, Kyle A. Menzel, MD, LCDR, MC, USNR{dagger}, Tyler A. Vachon, MD, LT, MC, USNR{dagger} and Christopher B. Dewing, MD, LCDR, MC, USNR{dagger}

From * The Sports Medicine Center, Appleton, Wisconsin and the {dagger} Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California

{ddagger} Address correspondence to Matthew T. Provencher, MD, Assistant Director, Orthopaedic Shoulder & Sports Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Drive, Suite 112, San Diego, California 92134-1112 (e-mail: mmpro98{at}earthlink.net).

Background: Recent literature has demonstrated that the success rates of arthroscopic stabilization of glenohumeral instability deteriorate in patients with an anteroinferior glenoid bone deficiency, also known as the "inverted pear" glenoid.

Purpose: This study was conducted to assess the outcomes of arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in patients with a mean anteroinferior glenoid bone deficiency of 25% (range, 20%–30%).

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Twenty-one of 23 patients (91% follow-up) undergoing arthroscopic stabilization surgery and noted to have a bony deficiency of the anteroinferior glenoid of 20% to 30% were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 34 months (range, 26–47). The mean age was 25 years (range, 20–34); 2 patients were female and 19 were male. All patients were treated with a primary anterior arthroscopic stabilization using a mean of 3.2 suture anchors (range, 3–4). Eleven patients had a bony Bankart that was incorporated into the repair; 10 had no bone fragment and were considered attritional bone loss. Outcomes were assessed using the Rowe score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) Index. Findings of recurrent instability and dislocation events were documented.

Results: Two patients (9.5%) experienced symptoms of recurrent subluxation, and 1 (4.8%) sustained a recurrent dislocation that required revision open surgery. The mean postoperative outcomes scores were as follows: SANE = 88.1 (range, 65–100; standard deviation [SD] 9.0); Rowe = 85.2 (range, 55–100; SD 14.1); ASES Score = 93.1 (range, 78–100; SD 5.3); and WOSI Index = 398 (82% of normal; range, 30–1175; SD 264). No patient with a bony fragment experienced a recurrent subluxation or dislocation, and mean outcomes scores for patients with a bony fragment were better than those with no bony fragment (P = .08). No patient required medical discharge from the military for his or her shoulder condition.

Conclusions: Arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent instability, even in the presence of a significant bony defect of the glenoid, can yield a stable shoulder; however, outcomes are not as predictable especially in attritional bone loss cases. Longer-term follow-up is needed to see if these results hold up over time.

Key Words: shoulder instability • shoulder dislocation • shoulder subluxation • glenoid bone loss • inverted pear glenoid • shoulder • arthroscopic shoulder • glenoid fracture • Bankart




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. J. Pagnani
Open Capsular Repair Without Bone Block for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients With and Without Bony Defects of the Glenoid and/or Humeral Head
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2008; 36(9): 1805 - 1812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
N. L. Millar and G. A. C. Murrell
The effectiveness of arthroscopic stabilisation for failed open shoulder instability surgery
J Bone Joint Surg Br, June 1, 2008; 90-B(6): 745 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. T. Provencher, A. J. Detterline, N. Ghodadra, A. A. Romeo, B. R. Bach Jr, B. J. Cole, and N. Verma
Measurement of Glenoid Bone Loss: A Comparison of Measurement Error Between 45{degrees} and 0{degrees} Bone Loss Models and With Different Posterior Arthroscopy Portal Locations
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 36(6): 1132 - 1138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. Reider
Filling in the Gaps
Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2008; 36(4): 635 - 637.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.