AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on April 23, 2007, doi:10.1177/0363546507301661
This version was published on August 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/8/1247    most recent
0363546507301661v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Charousset, C.
Right arrow Articles by Petrover, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Charousset, C.
Right arrow Articles by Petrover, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Imaging Studies
Right arrow Shoulder
Right arrow Arthroscopy
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 35:1247-1253 (2007)
© 2007 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Can a Double-Row Anchorage Technique Improve Tendon Healing in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair?

A Prospective, Nonrandomized, Comparative Study of Double-Row and Single-Row Anchorage Techniques With Computed Tomographic Arthrography Tendon Healing Assessment

Christophe Charousset, MD{dagger},*, Jean Grimberg, MD{dagger}, Louis Denis Duranthon, MD{dagger}, Laurance Bellaiche, MD{ddagger} and David Petrover, MD{ddagger}

From the {dagger} Association Francilienne de Traumatologie du Sport, Paris, France, and the {ddagger} Clinique Bachaumont, Service de Radiologie, Paris, France

* Address correspondence to Christophe Charousset, Association Francilienne de Traumatologie du Sport, 60, rue de Courcelles, 75008 Paris, France (e-mail: c.charousset{at}lafts.com).

Background: Increasing the rate of watertight tendon healing has been suggested as an important criterion for optimizing clinical results in rotator cuff arthroscopic repair.

Hypothesis: A double-row anchorage technique for rotator cuff repair will produce better clinical results and a better rate of tendon healing than a single-row technique.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: We compared 31 patients undergoing surgery with a double-row anchorage technique using Panalok anchors and Cuff Tack anchors and 35 patients with rotator cuff tear undergoing surgery with a single-row anchorage arthroscopic technique using Panalok anchors. We compared pre- and postoperative Constant score and tendon healing, as evaluated by computed tomographic arthrography 6 months after surgery, in these 2 groups.

Results: The Constant score increased significantly in both groups, with no difference between the 2 groups (P = .4). Rotator cuff healing was judged anatomic in 19 patients with double-row anchorage and in 14 patients with single-row anchorage; this difference between the groups was significant (P = .03).

Conclusion: In this first study comparing double- and single-row anchorage techniques, we found no significant difference in clinical results, but tendon healing rates were better with the double-row anchorage. Improvements in the double-row technique might lead to better clinical and tendon healing results.

Key Words: arthroscopy rotator cuff repair • rotator cuff footprint • double-row fixation • tendon healing




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. B. Frank, N. S. ElAttrache, J. S. Dines, A. Blackburn, J. Crues, and J. E. Tibone
Repair Site Integrity After Arthroscopic Transosseous-Equivalent Suture-Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1496 - 1503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
O. Lorbach, F. Bachelier, J. Vees, D. Kohn, and D. Pape
Cyclic Loading of Rotator Cuff Reconstructions: Single-Row Repair With Modified Suture Configurations Versus Double-Row Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1504 - 1510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J.-Y. Park, S.-H. Lhee, J.-H. Choi, H.-K. Park, J.-W. Yu, and J.-B. Seo
Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Single- and Double-row Repairs in Rotator Cuff Tears
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2008; 36(7): 1310 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. T. Busfield, R. E. Glousman, M. H. McGarry, J. E. Tibone, and T. Q. Lee
A Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Technical Variations of Double-Row Rotator Cuff Fixation: The Importance of Medial Row Knots
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2008; 36(5): 901 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.