AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on March 2, 2007, doi:10.1177/0363546506298582
This version was published on June 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/6/889    most recent
0363546506298582v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkley, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkley, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Meniscus
Right arrow Arthroscopy
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 35:889-896 (2007)
© 2007 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Effectiveness of Bioabsorbable Arrows Compared With Inside-Out Suturing for Vertical, Reparable Meniscal Lesions

A Randomized Clinical Trial

Dianne Bryant, PhD{dagger},*, James Dill, MD, FRCSC§, Robert Litchfield, MD, FRCSC||, Annunziato Amendola, MD, FRCSC, Robert Giffin, MD, FRCSC||, Peter Fowler, MD, FRCSC|| and Alexandra Kirkley, MD, MSc, FRCSC||,{ddagger}

From the {dagger} School of Physical Therapy, Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Division, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, § Cape Breton Regional Hospital, Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada, || Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, and University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa

* Address correspondence to Dianne Bryant, PhD, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Division, University of Western Ontario, Elborn College, Room 1438, London, ON, N6G 1H1 (e-mail: Dianne.Bryant{at}uwo.ca).

Background: Techniques for repairing the meniscus include both open and arthroscopic techniques using sutures and bioabsorbable implants. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of inside-out suturing and bioabsorbable arrows for repair of vertical meniscal lesions.

Study Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: One hundred consecutive patients were randomly assigned to arrows (n = 51) or sutures (n = 49). Sixty-five percent of patients (31 sutures, 34 arrows) underwent a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A blinded research associate conducted assessments at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was retear rate. Secondary outcomes included the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality of Life Outcome Measure, and side-to-side comparisons of flexion and extension.

Results: At baseline, groups were similar in age, gender, time from injury to surgery, and length and location of tear. Mean follow-up was 28.0 ± 8.4 months. There were 22 failed meniscal repairs (11 in each group), which did not represent a significant difference in the rate of failure between groups (P = .92). The mean quality of life scores and side-to-side differences in extension and flexion measurements were not significantly different between groups. Two patients from the arrow group crossed over into the suture group at the time of surgery because of technical difficulties with the device, and in 3 instances, a single suture was needed to keep the tear reduced while arrows were introduced. Two patients required reoperation for removal of a prominent, subcutaneous arrow, and 1 patient in the suture group suffered a transient peroneal nerve palsy during revision suturing.

Conclusion: At intermediate follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in measured outcomes between meniscal suturing and arrows. Longer term follow-up is necessary to identify differences between these 2 treatments, particularly to estimate the incidence of articular surface damage in patients whose meniscal tear was repaired using arrows.

Key Words: meniscal lesion • meniscal repair • arrow • inside-out suturing




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. A. Turman and M. D. Miller
What's New in Sports Medicine
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2008; 90(1): 211 - 222.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.