AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on January 29, 2007, doi:10.1177/0363546506296042
This version was published on April 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/4/564    most recent
0363546506296042v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinczewski, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Linklater, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinczewski, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Linklater, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Reconstruction
Right arrow Knee
Right arrow Graft fixation
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 35:564-574 (2007)
© 2007 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

A 10-Year Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions With Hamstring Tendon and Patellar Tendon Autograft

A Controlled, Prospective Trial

Leo A. Pinczewski, FRACS{dagger},*, Jeffrey Lyman, MD{dagger}, Lucy J. Salmon, PhD{dagger}, Vivianne J. Russell, BSc (Biomed){dagger}, Justin Roe, FRACS{dagger} and James Linklater, FRANZCR{ddagger}

From {dagger} North Sydney Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre, Sydney, Australia, and {ddagger} Castlereagh Imaging, Sydney, Australia

* Address correspondence to Dr. Leo Pinczewski, FRACS, North Sydney Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre, 286 Pacific Highway, Crows Nest, Sydney NSW 2065 Australia (e-mail: lpinczewski{at}nsosmc.com.au).

Background: There are no controlled, prospective studies comparing the 10-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using patellar tendon (PT) and 4-strand hamstring tendon (HT) autografts.

Hypothesis: Comparable results are possible with HT and PT autografts.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: One hundred eighty ACL-deficient knees that met inclusion criteria underwent ACL reconstruction (90 HT autograft, 90 PT autograft) by one surgeon and were treated with an accelerated rehabilitation program. All knees were observed in a prospective fashion with subjective, objective, and radiographic evaluation at 2, 5, 7, and 10-year intervals.

Results: At 10 years, there were no differences in graft rupture rates (7/90 PT vs. 12/90 HT, P = .24). There were 20 contralateral ACL ruptures in the PT group, compared with 9 in the HT group (P = .02). In all patients, graft rupture was associated with instrumented laxity >2 mm at 2 years (P = .001). Normal or near-normal function of the knee was reported in 97% of patients in both groups. In the PT group, harvest-site symptoms (P = .001) and kneeling pain (P = .01) were more common than in the HT group. More patients reported pain with strenuous activities in PT knees than in HT knees (P = .05). Radiographic osteoarthritis was more common in PT knees than the HT-reconstructed knees (P = .04). The difference, however, was composed of patients with mild osteoarthritis. Other predictors of radiographic osteoarthritis were <90% single-legged hop test at 1 year and the need for further knee surgery. An "ideal" outcome, defined as an overall International Knee Documentation Committee grade of A or B and a radiographic grade of A at 10 years after ACL reconstruction, was associated with <3 mm of instrumented laxity at 2 years, the absence of additional surgery in the knee, and HT grafts.

Conclusions: It is possible to obtain excellent results with both HT and PT autografts. We recommend HT reconstructions to our patients because of decreased harvest-site symptoms and radiographic osteoarthritis.

Key Words: ACL reconstruction • patellar tendon • hamstring tendon • long-term • osteoarthritis • clinical




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
U. G. Longo, J. B. King, V. Denaro, and N. Maffulli
Double-bundle arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: DOES THE EVIDENCE ADD UP?
J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2008; 90-B(8): 995 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
P Renstrom, A Ljungqvist, E Arendt, B Beynnon, T Fukubayashi, W Garrett, T Georgoulis, T E Hewett, R Johnson, T Krosshaug, et al.
Non-contact ACL injuries in female athletes: an International Olympic Committee current concepts statement
Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 42(6): 394 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.