AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on January 29, 2007, doi:10.1177/0363546506294858
This version was published on March 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/3/427    most recent
0363546506294858v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warden, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Crossley, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warden, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Crossley, K. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Imaging Studies
Right arrow Knee
Right arrow Muscle
Right arrow Patella
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 35:427-436 (2007)
© 2007 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Comparative Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography in Confirming Clinically Diagnosed Patellar Tendinopathy

Stuart J. Warden, BPhysio (Hons), PhD{dagger},{ddagger},*, Zoltan S. Kiss, MBBS, FRANZCR{ddagger},§, Frank A. Malara, MBBS, FRANZCR||, Alistair B. T. Ooi{ddagger}, Jill L. Cook, BAppSci (Physio), PhD# and Kay M. Crossley, BAppSci (Physio), PhD{ddagger}

From the {dagger} Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, {ddagger} Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, School of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, § Department of Radiology, Mercy Private Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, || Victoria House Medical Imaging, Prahran, Victoria, Australia, Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, and # Musculoskeletal Research Centre, School of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia

* Address correspondence to Stuart J. Warden, BPhysio (Hons), PhD, Department of Physical Therapy, Indiana University, 1140 West Michigan Street, CF-326, Indianapolis, IN 46202 (e-mail: stwarden{at}iupui.edu).

Background: Diagnosis of patellar tendinopathy is based primarily on clinical examination; however, it is commonplace to image the patellar tendon for diagnosis confirmation, with the imaging modalities of choice being magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US). The comparative accuracy of these modalities has not been established.

Hypothesis: Magnetic resonance imaging and US have good (>80%) accuracy and show substantial agreement in confirming clinically diagnosed patellar tendinopathy.

Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging and US (gray scale [GS-US] and color Doppler [CD-US]) features of 30 participants with clinically diagnosed patellar tendinopathy and 33 activity-matched, asymptomatic participants were prospectively compared. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the likelihood of positive and negative test results were determined for each technique.

Results: The accuracy of MRI, GS-US, and CD-US was 70%, 83%, and 83%, respectively (P = .04; MRI vs GS-US). The likelihood of positive MRI, GS-US, and CD-US was 3.1, 4.8, and 11.6, respectively. The MRI and GS-US had equivalent specificity (82% vs 82%; P = 1.00); however, the sensitivity of GS-US was greater than MRI (87% vs 57%; P = .01). Sensitivity (70% vs 87%; P = .06) and specificity (94% vs 82%; P = .10) did not differ between CD-US and GS-US.

Conclusions: Ultrasonography was more accurate than MRI in confirming clinically diagnosed patellar tendinopathy. GS-US and CD-US may represent the best combination for confirming clinically diagnosed patellar tendinopathy because GS-US had the greatest sensitivity, while a positive CD-US test result indicated a strong likelihood an individual was symptomatic.

Key Words: anterior knee pain • jumper’s knee • MRI • tendinitis • ultrasound




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
S. J. Warden, B. R. Metcalf, Z. S. Kiss, J. L. Cook, C. R. Purdam, K. L. Bennell, and K. M. Crossley
Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for chronic patellar tendinopathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Rheumatology, April 1, 2008; 47(4): 467 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.