AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on December 7, 2006, doi:10.1177/0363546506294856
This version was published on March 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/3/421    most recent
0363546506294856v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson-Helander, K.
Right arrow Articles by Karlsson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson-Helander, K.
Right arrow Articles by Karlsson, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Achilles tendon
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 35:421-426 (2007)
© 2007 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

The Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)

Development and Validation

Katarina Nilsson-Helander, MD*, Roland Thomeé, PT, PhD, Karin Grävare-Silbernagel, PT, Pia Thomeé, PT, Eva Faxén, PT, Bengt I. Eriksson, MD, PhD and Jon Karlsson, MD, PhD

From Lundberg Laboratory for Orthopaedic Research, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, Sweden

* Address correspondence to Katarina Nilsson-Helander, MD, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, SE-416 85 Göteborg, Sweden (e-mail: ina.nilsson{at}telia.com).

Background: There is a need for a patient-relevant instrument to evaluate outcome after treatment in patients with a total Achilles tendon rupture.

Purpose: To develop and validate a new patient-reported instrument for measuring outcome after treatment for total Achilles tendon rupture.

Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: Development of this instrument consisted of item generation and test construction, item reduction, validation, evaluation of structure and internal consistency, test–retest, and test for responsiveness. The final version, the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), was tested for validity, structure, and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) on 82 patients and 52 healthy persons. A correlation analysis was performed of the ATRS with the 2 validated foot/ankle/Achilles tendon scores, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the Swedish version of the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment–Achilles questionnaire (VISA-A-S). Structure was evaluated with factor analysis. Test–retest reliability was evaluated on 43 patients. The ATRS responsiveness was tested on 43 patients by calculating the effect size.

Results: The total score for the patients ranged from 17 to 100 with a mean (median) of 77 (85) and a standard deviation (interquartile range) of 21.4 (23). A significantly (P < .0001) higher total score was found for the healthy subjects, ranging from 94 to 100 with a mean (median) of 99.8 (100) and a standard deviation (interquartile range) of 1.1 (0). The ATRS correlated significantly (P < .01) with all subscales of the FAOS (r = 0.60–0.84) and the VISA-A-S (r = 0.78). The factor analysis gave 1 factor of importance. The internal consistency was 0.96 as measured with Cronbach’s alpha. The test–retest produced an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98. The tests for responsiveness showed an effect size between 0.87 and 2.21.

Conclusion: The ATRS is a patient-reported instrument with high reliability, validity, and sensitivity for measuring outcome after treatment in patients with a total Achilles tendon rupture.

Clinical Relevance: The ATRS is a self-administered instrument with high clinical utility, and we suggest the score for measuring the outcome, related to symptoms and physical activity, after treatment in patients with a total Achilles tendon rupture.

Key Words: Achilles tendon • rupture • score • outcome




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. A. Suchak, G. P. Bostick, L. A. Beaupre, D. C. Durand, and N. M. Jomha
The Influence of Early Weight-Bearing Compared with Non-Weight-Bearing After Surgical Repair of the Achilles Tendon
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2008; 90(9): 1876 - 1883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.