AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on July 19, 2007, doi:10.1177/0363546507304139
This version was published on November 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/11/1931    most recent
0363546507304139v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, T. Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, T. Q.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biomechanics
Right arrow Shoulder
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 35:1931-1939 (2007)
© 2007 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

The Biomechanical Effects of Dynamic External Rotation on Rotator Cuff Repair Compared to Testing With the Humerus Fixed

Maxwell C. Park, MD{dagger},*, Bong J. Jun, MS{ddagger}, Chong J. Park, PhD§, Christopher S. Ahmad, MD||, Neal S. ElAttrache, MD and Thay Q. Lee, PhD{ddagger}

From the {dagger} Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Woodland Hills Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Los Angeles, California, {ddagger} Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, California, and the University of California, Irvine, § Department of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, || Center for Shoulder, Elbow, and Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, and the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Los Angeles, California

* Address correspondence to Maxwell C. Park, MD, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Woodland Hills Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 5601 De Soto Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 91365 (e-mail: mcp16{at}columbia.edu).

Background: Biomechanical testing without humeral motion is a standard method for evaluating rotator cuff repair constructs. This cannot elucidate the effects of dynamic external rotation on the repair, which is a common postoperative motion.

Hypothesis: Biomechanical properties and gap formation of rotator cuff repairs will be different when dynamic external rotation is allowed to occur during loading.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: In 6 matched pairs of human cadaveric shoulders, a commonly used single-row rotator cuff repair was performed. In 6 shoulders, a materials testing machine and a custom testing apparatus that permits cyclic rotation (0°–30°) were employed (group 1). In contralateral shoulders, the apparatus was fixed to prevent humeral rotation (group 2). All repairs were cyclically loaded from 0 to 60 N at a displacement rate of 1 mm/s for 30 cycles. The constructs were then loaded to failure. Repair strength, gap formation, and strain were compared between groups.

Results: Cyclic loading revealed no difference in linear stiffness between testing conditions. Hysteresis was significantly greater when dynamic external rotation was allowed to occur. With load to failure, there were no differences in yield or ultimate load. Anterior tendon gap formation was greater at end rotation (30° of humeral external rotation) and at yield load, and strain on the posterior tendon was less with dynamic external rotation. With dynamic external rotation, gap formation and tendon strain were significantly greater in the anterior region of the supraspinatus tendon compared with the posterior region.

Discussion: External rotation using postoperative physiologic loads affects gap formation and tendon strain between anterior and posterior supraspinatus tendon regions. Previous testing models without humeral rotation may underestimate gap formation and anterior tendon strain and overestimate posterior tendon strain.

Clinical Relevance: Understanding regional differences with respect to these variables, depending on quality of repair, may provide the surgeon a framework from which to prescribe guidelines for postoperative rehabilitation.

Key Words: rotator cuff • rotation • gap formation • tendon strain




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. C. Park, J. A. Idjadi, N. S. ElAttrache, J. E. Tibone, M. H. McGarry, and T. Q. Lee
The Effect of Dynamic External Rotation Comparing 2 Footprint-Restoring Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2008; 36(5): 893 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.