AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on August 8, 2007, doi:10.1177/0363546507305016
This version was published on November 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/11/1865    most recent
0363546507305016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Driscoll, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dietz, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O’Driscoll, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dietz, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Muscle
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 35:1865-1869 (2007)
© 2007 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

The Hook Test for Distal Biceps Tendon Avulsion

Shawn W. O’Driscoll, PhD, MD{dagger},*, Lucas B. J. Goncalves, MD{ddagger} and Patricio Dietz, MD§

From the {dagger} Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, {ddagger} Hospital Madre Teresa, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, and § Hospital Base Osorno, Osorno, Chile

* Address correspondence to Shawn W. O’Driscoll, PhD, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, MSB 3-69, Rochester, MN 55905 (e-mail: odriscoll.shawn{at}mayo.edu).

Background: Complete biceps tendon avulsions are frequently missed on clinical examination, suggesting the need for a reliable diagnostic test.

Hypothesis: Complete distal biceps avulsions can be reliably detected with the Hook test.

Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: The hook test was performed by a single surgeon in a cohort of 45 patients undergoing surgical exploration of the distal biceps tendon. While the patient actively supinates with the elbow flexed 90°, an intact hook test permits the examiner to hook his or her index finger under the intact biceps tendon from the lateral side. With an abnormal hook test, indicating distal avulsion, there is no cord-like structure under which the examiner may hook a finger.

Results: Thirty-three patients had an avulsion and 12 had a partial tear. The hook test was abnormal in 33 of 33 (100%) patients with complete biceps avulsions, and intact in 12 of 12 with partial detachments. However, it was painful in 9 of those 12. In the noninjured contralateral arms, which served as the normal control group, 45 of 45 (100%) had a normal hook test. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosed a complete tear in 11 of 12 patients with partial tears and in 11 of 13 with complete lesions. The sensitivity and specificity were both higher with the hook test (both 100%) than with MRI (92% and 85%, respectively).

Conclusions: The hook test is a highly sensitive and specific test for assessment of distal biceps tendon avulsions.

Key Words: biceps • tendon • avulsion • rupture • elbow







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.