AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on May 9, 2006, doi:10.1177/0363546506287489
This version was published on September 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/9/1492    most recent
0363546506287489v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bushnell, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Creighton, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bushnell, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Creighton, R. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Operative
Right arrow Biomechanics
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 34:1492-1499 (2006)
© 2006 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

The Use of Suture Anchors in Repair of the Ruptured Patellar Tendon

A Biomechanical Study

Brandon D. Bushnell, MD*, Ian R. Byram, Paul S. Weinhold, PhD and R. Alex Creighton, MD

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

* Address correspondence to Brandon D. Bushnell, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB #7055, Bioinformatics Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7055 (e-mail: bbushnel{at}unch.unc.edu).

Background: Rupture of the patellar tendon is a disabling injury that usually requires surgical treatment. The standard method of repair involves placing suture loops through transpatellar tunnels. The use of suture anchors in patellar tendon repair has not been previously described.

Hypothesis: No difference exists in the amount of gap formation during cyclic loading or in ultimate load-to-failure strength between repairs performed with anchors and those performed with 2 types of transpatellar sutures.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Six matched pairs of cadaveric knees were tested in a custom biomechanical apparatus based on an established model. Repairs were performed using either suture anchors with No. 2 FiberWire or transpatellar suture tunnels using 2 different types of suture—No. 5 Ethibond and No. 2 FiberWire. Gap formation across the repair site during 250 cycles of extension as well as ramp-up load to failure were measured for each repair.

Results: The mean total gap formation across the repair site at 250 cycles was 4.1 ± 1.9 mm for the suture anchor group, 6.7 ± 1.8 mm for the FiberWire tunnel group, and 8.5 ± 2.7 mm for the Ethibond tunnel group. Mean load to failure was 779 ± 183 N, 730 ± 83 N, and 763 ± 231 N, respectively.

Conclusion: Significantly less gap formation throughout 250 cycles (P = .009) and no difference in load to failure occurred with patellar tendon repairs performed with suture anchors as compared with repairs performed with transpatellar tunnels.

Clinical Relevance: The newly described method, using suture anchors for repair of patellar tendon ruptures, may be clinically equal or superior to the established method of using transpatellar tunnels.

Key Words: patellar tendon repair • suture anchors • transpatellar tunnels • extensor mechanism






HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.