|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
From the Department of Physical Therapy, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
* Address correspondence to Stuart J. Warden, BPhysio (Hons), PhD, Department of Physical Therapy, Indiana University, 1140 W. Michigan Street, CF-326, Indianapolis, IN 46202 (e-mail: stwarden{at}iupui.edu).
Background: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used to treat ligament injuries; however, their individual and combined effects are not established.
Hypotheses: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates ligament healing, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug delays healing, and the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug inhibits the beneficial effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Sixty adult rats underwent bilateral transection of their knee medial collateral ligaments. Animals were divided into 2 drug groups and treated 5 d/wk with celecoxib (5 mg/kg) mixed in a vehicle solution (NSAID group) or vehicle alone (VEH group). One to 3 hours after drug administration, all animals were treated with unilateral active low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and contralateral inactive low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. Equal numbers of animals from each drug group were mechanically tested at 2 weeks (n = 14/group), 4 weeks (n = 8/group), and 12 weeks (n = 8/group) after injury.
Results: Ultrasound and drug intervention did not interact to influence ligament mechanical properties at any time point. After 2 weeks of intervention, ligaments treated with active low-intensity pulsed ultrasound were 34.2% stronger, 27.0% stiffer, and could absorb 54.4% more energy before failure than could ligaments treated with inactive low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, whereas ligaments from the NSAID group could absorb 33.3% less energy than could ligaments from the VEH group. There were no ultrasound or drug effects after 4 and 12 weeks of intervention.
Conclusions: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerated but did not improve ligament healing, whereas the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug delayed but did not impair healing. When used in combination, the beneficial low-intensity pulsed ultrasound effect was cancelled by the detrimental nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug effect.
Clinical Relevance: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound after ligament injury may facilitate earlier return to activity, whereas non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may elevate early reinjury risk.
Key Words: biomechanics ligament healing medial collateral ligament (MCL) therapeutic ultrasound
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P Tscholl, A Junge, and J Dvorak The use of medication and nutritional supplements during FIFA World Cups 2002 and 2006 Br. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2008; 42(9): 725 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-C. Fu, W.-T. Shum, L.-K. Hung, M. W.-N. Wong, L. Qin, and K.-M. Chan Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Tendon Healing: A Study of the Effect of Treatment Duration and Treatment Initiation Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2008; 36(9): 1742 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Warden, B. R. Metcalf, Z. S. Kiss, J. L. Cook, C. R. Purdam, K. L. Bennell, and K. M. Crossley Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for chronic patellar tendinopathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Rheumatology, April 1, 2008; 47(4): 467 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Steiner, M. M. Murray, and S. A. Rodeo Strategies to Improve Anterior Cruciate Ligament Healing and Graft Placement Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2008; 36(1): 176 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. J Robertson Invited Commentary Physical Therapy, August 1, 2007; 87(8): 995 - 999. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |