AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on June 30, 2006, doi:10.1177/0363546506289433
This version was published on November 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/11/1815    most recent
0363546506289433v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Amis, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Amis, A. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Knee
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 34:1815-1823 (2006)
© 2006 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

The Role of the Medial Collateral Ligament and Posteromedial Capsule in Controlling Knee Laxity

James R. Robinson, FRCS, Anthony M. J. Bull, PhD, Rhidian R. deW. Thomas, FRCS Ed(Orth) and Andrew A. Amis, DSc*

From Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

* Address correspondence to Andrew A. Amis, DSc, Mechanical Engineering Department, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK (e-mail: a.amis{at}imperial.ac.uk).

Background: The medial aspect of the knee has a complex capsular structure; the biomechanical roles of specific structures are not well understood.

Hypothesis: The 3 strong stabilizing structures, the superficial and deep medial collateral ligaments and the posteromedial capsule, make distinct contributions to controlling tibiofemoral laxity.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Changes in knee laxity under anterior-posterior drawer, valgus, and internal-external rotation loads were found by sequential cutting in 18 cadaveric knees. Three cutting sequences allowed the roles of the 3 structures to be seen in isolation and in combination. Some force contributions were also calculated.

Results: The posteromedial capsule controlled valgus, internal rotation, and posterior drawer in extension, resisting 42% of a 150-N drawer force when the tibia was in internal rotation. The superficial collateral ligament controlled valgus at all angles and was dominant from 30° to 90° of flexion, plus internal rotation in flexion. The deep collateral ligament controlled tibial anterior drawer of the flexed and externally rotated knee and was a secondary restraint to valgus.

Conclusion: Distinct roles in controlling tibiofemoral laxity have been found for these structures that vary according to knee flexion and tibial rotation.

Clinical Relevance: The restraining functions demonstrated provide new information about knee stabilization, which may allow better evaluation of structural damage at the medial aspect of the knee.

Key Words: medial collateral ligament (MCL) • posteromedial capsule (PMC) • knee stability • joint laxity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
J. Robinson, L. Carrat, C. Granchi, and P. Colombet
Influence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Bundles on Knee Kinematics: Clinical Assessment Using Computer-Assisted Navigation
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2007; 35(12): 2006 - 2013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.