AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on May 30, 2006, doi:10.1177/0363546506288728
This version was published on October 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/10/1643    most recent
0363546506288728v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kibler, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Dome, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kibler, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Dome, D.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 34:1643-1647 (2006)
© 2006 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Evaluation of Apparent and Absolute Supraspinatus Strength in Patients With Shoulder Injury Using the Scapular Retraction Test

W. Ben Kibler, MD, Aaron Sciascia, MS, ATC* and David Dome, MD, ATC

From the Lexington Clinic Sports Medicine Center, Lexington, Kentucky

* Address correspondence to Aaron Sciascia, MS, ATC, 1221 South Broadway, Lexington, KY 40504 (e-mail: ascia{at}lexclin.com).

Background: Physical examination of patients with shoulder injury not involving actual rotator cuff tears frequently demonstrates decreased rotator cuff strength on manual muscle testing. This decrease has been attributed to supraspinatus muscle weakness, but it may be owing to alterations in scapular position.

Hypothesis: The position of stabilized scapular retraction, by minimizing proximal kinetic chain factors and providing a stable base of muscle origin, positively influences demonstrated supraspinatus strength.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Supraspinatus strength was tested in 20 injured patients and 10 healthy controls in both the empty-can arm position and a position of scapular retraction using a handheld dynamometer. Pain in both maneuvers was measured by use of a visual analog scale.

Results: Paired t tests indicated the scapular retraction position resulted in statistically significantly (P = .001) higher supraspinatus strength values within both groups. There was no significant difference between the 2 positions in visual analog scale scores.

Conclusion: This study shows that demonstrated apparent supraspinatus weakness on clinical examination in symptomatic patients may be dependent on scapular position. The weakness may be owing to other factors besides supraspinatus muscle weakness, such as a lack of a stable base in the kinetic chain or scapula.

Clinical Relevance: The clinical examination that addresses scapular posture and includes scapular retraction will allow more accurate determination of absolute supraspinatus muscle strength and allow efficacious rehabilitation protocols to address the source of the demonstrated weakness.

Key Words: shoulder examination • scapula • retraction • rotator cuff




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. G. Laudner, J. M. Stanek, and K. Meister
Differences in Scapular Upward Rotation Between Baseball Pitchers and Position Players
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2007; 35(12): 2091 - 2095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
W. B Kibler, T J. Chandler, R. Shapiro, and M. Conuel
Muscle activation in coupled scapulohumeral motions in the high performance tennis serve
Br. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2007; 41(11): 745 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.