AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on June 30, 2006, doi:10.1177/0363546506288677
This version was published on October 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/10/1630    most recent
0363546506288677v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Kampen, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fu, F. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Kampen, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fu, F. H.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 34:1630-1635 (2006)
© 2006 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

The "Value Added" of Neurocognitive Testing After Sports-Related Concussion

Derk A. Van Kampen*, Mark R. Lovell, PhD{dagger},{ddagger}, Jamie E. Pardini, PhD{ddagger}, Michael W. Collins, PhD{ddagger} and Freddie H. Fu, MD{ddagger}

From the * Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands, and the {ddagger} Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

{dagger} Address correspondence to Mark R. Lovell, PhD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3200 South Water Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15203 (e-mail: lovellmr{at}upmc.edu).

Background: Neurocognitive testing has been endorsed as a "cornerstone" of concussion management by recent Vienna and Prague meetings of the Concussion in Sport Group. Neurocognitive testing is important given the potential unreliability of athlete self-report after injury. Relying only on athletes’ reports of symptoms may result in premature return of athletes to contact sport, potentially exposing them to additional injury.

Hypothesis: Use of computer-based neurocognitive testing results in an increased capacity to detect postconcussive abnormalities after injury.

Study Design: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: High school and college athletes with a diagnosed concussion were tested 2 days after injury. Postinjury neurocognitive performance (Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing) and symptom (postconcussion symptom) scores were compared with preinjury (baseline) scores and with those of an age- and education-matched noninjured athlete control group. "Abnormal" test performance was determined statistically with Reliable Change Index scores.

Results: Sixty-four percent of concussed athletes reported a significant increase in symptoms, as judged by postconcussion symptom scores, compared with preinjury baseline at 2 days after injury. Eighty-three percent of the concussed sample demonstrated significantly poorer neurocognitive test results relative to their own baseline performance. The addition of neurocognitive testing resulted in a net increase in sensitivity of 19%. Ninety-three percent of the sample had either abnormal neurocognitive test results or a significant increase in symptoms, relative to their own baseline; 30% of a control group demonstrated either abnormalities in neurocognitive testing or elevated symptoms, as judged by postconcussion symptom scores. For the concussed group, use of symptom and neurocognitive test results resulted in an increased yield of 29% overreliance on symptoms alone. In contrast, 0% of the control group had both symptoms and abnormal neurocognitive testing.

Conclusion: Reliance on patients’ self-reported symptoms after concussion is likely to result in underdiagnosis of concussion and may result in premature return to play. Neurocognitive testing increases diagnostic accuracy when used in conjunction with self-reported symptoms.

Key Words: concussion • neurocognitive testing • neuropsychological testing • Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. C. Cantu, S. A. Herring, M. Putukian, the American College of Sports Medicine, P. R. Stricker, J. Moriarity, F. G. O'Connor, T. M. McCambridge, E. Small, D. T. Bernhardt, et al.
Concussion
N. Engl. J. Med., April 26, 2007; 356(17): 1787 - 1789.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.