|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




From the
Sports Medicine Research Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, and the
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
* Address correspondence to Paul A. Borsa, PhD, ATC, University of Florida, 149 Florida Gymnasium, PO Box 118205, Gainesville, FL 32611-8205 (e-mail: pborsa{at}hhp.ufl.edu).
Background: Stress radiography has been the established imaging method for quantifying glenohumeral joint laxity. Dynamic ultrasound is an alternative imaging method that may be used to measure glenohumeral laxity; however, validity and repeatability have not been examined.
Objective: To determine criterion-related validity and repeatability of a sonographic imaging method for measuring glenohumeral laxity in asymptomatic shoulders.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: In experiment 1, 20 subjects were assessed for glenohumeral laxity using stress radiography and dynamic ultrasound. In the second experiment, 13 subjects were assessed for laxity in 2 separate test sessions using the dynamic ultrasound technique.
Results: Correlational analysis between the sonographic and radiographic measures revealed an r = 0.79 (r2 = 0.62), indicating excellent criterion-related validity for the sonographic imaging method. Test-retest repeatability was 0.72 and 0.85 for anterior and posterior translation, respectively, and interrater repeatability was 0.96 and 0.99 for anterior and posterior translation, respectively.
Conclusions: Dynamic ultrasound appears to be a valid and repeatable method for assessing glenohumeral laxity in a clinical setting.
Clinical Relevance: Based on the results of this study, dynamic ultrasound is a repeatable and valid method for measuring glenohumeral laxity and therefore may be used as a viable replacement for stress radiography during assessments of glenohumeral laxity.
Key Words: shoulder translation ultrasound radiography ligament
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. H. Stapleton, L. Herrington, and K. George Anterior Translation at the Glenohumeral Joint: A Cause of Axillary Artery Compression? Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2008; 36(3): 539 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
BASEM 2006 Annual Conference Br. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 41(2): 118 - 124. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bahk, E. Keyurapan, A. Tasaki, E. L. Sauers, and E. G. McFarland Laxity Testing of the Shoulder: A Review Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2007; 35(1): 131 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Borsa, K. E. Wilk, J. A. Jacobson, J. S. Scibek, G. C. Dover, M. M. Reinold, and J. R. Andrews Correlation of Range of Motion and Glenohumeral Translation in Professional Baseball Pitchers Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2005; 33(9): 1392 - 1399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Borsa, J. S. Scibek, J. A. Jacobson, and K. Meister Sonographic Stress Measurement of Glenohumeral Joint Laxity in Collegiate Swimmers and Age-Matched Controls Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2005; 33(7): 1077 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |