AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on February 16, 2005, doi:10.1177/0363546504271210
This version was published on May 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/5/646    most recent
0363546504271210v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noyes, F. R.
Right arrow Articles by Barber-Westin, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Noyes, F. R.
Right arrow Articles by Barber-Westin, S. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Knee
Right arrow Operative
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 33:646-654 (2005)
© 2005 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Posterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Reconstruction, Part 1

Causes of Surgical Failure in 52 Consecutive Operations

Frank R. Noyes, MD and Sue D. Barber-Westin*

From the Cincinnati Sportsmedicine Research and Education Foundation, Cincinnati, Ohio

* Address correspondence to Sue D. Barber-Westin, c/o Cincinnati Sportsmedice Research and Education Foundation, Deaconess Hospital, 311 Straight Street, Cincinnati, OH 45219 (e-mail: sbwestin{at}csmref.org).

Background: Posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions have not shown uniformly predictable results in restoration of normal posterior tibial translation. The authors are unaware of any study that has assessed the causes of failure of these operations, and they investigated 52 prior unsuccessful posterior cruciate ligament procedures to determine the factors that contributed to failure of the operations.

Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: The authors studied 52 prior failed posterior cruciate ligament surgeries that had been done in 41 knees (40 patients). Graft reconstructions had been done in 31 cases, primary repairs in 14, synthetic replacements in 4, and thermoplasties in 3. Medical records, operative notes, radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging scans were reviewed, and a comprehensive knee examination was conducted.

Results: A single factor that caused the operations to fail was identified in 23 (44%) of 52 operations, and multiple factors were identified in 29 (56%). The most common probable causes of failure were associated posterolateral ligament deficiency (40%), improper graft tunnel placement (33%), associated varus malalignment (31%), and primary suture repair (25%). Sixteen of 21 (76%) prior posterolateral ligament procedures had failed, as had 9 of 19 (47%) prior anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Twenty-nine knees (71%) presented with pain with activities of daily living. Thirty-four knees (83%) had compounding problems of joint arthritis, prior meniscectomy, associated ligament deficiencies, or varus malalignment. Posterior cruciate revision surgery was done in 22 knees (54%). Eleven knees (27%) had severe joint damage that contraindicated revision, and 8 (19%) declined further operations.

Conclusions: Failure to restore associated ligament instabilities and incorrect tunnel placement were major factors contributing to surgical failure. The results suggest the need for greater emphasis on the initial reconstruction in graft tunnel placement, correction of associated ligament instabilities, and correction of varus osseous malalignment. Failure of concurrent posterolateral ligament reconstructions was frequently encountered, suggesting the need for higher strength augmentation procedures or anatomical graft replacement.

Key Words: posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) • revision




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. Apsingi, T. Nguyen, A. M. J. Bull, A. Unwin, D. J. Deehan, and A. A. Amis
Control of Laxity in Knees With Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Corner Deficiency: Comparison of Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Combined With Modified Larson Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2008; 36(3): 487 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. F. Anderson and C. N. Anderson
Posterior Cruciate and Posterolateral Ligament Reconstruction in an Adolescent with Open Physes. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2007; 89(7): 1598 - 1604.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. H. Ahn, J. H. Wang, S. H. Lee, J. C. Yoo, and W. J. Jeon
Increasing the Distance Between the Posterior Cruciate Ligament and the Popliteal Neurovascular Bundle by a Limited Posterior Capsular Release During Arthroscopic Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Angiographic Study
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2007; 35(5): 787 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
F. R. Noyes and S. D. Barber-Westin
Posterolateral Knee Reconstruction With an Anatomical Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Reconstruction of the Fibular Collateral Ligament
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 259 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
F. R. Noyes, S. D. Barber-Westin, and J. C. Albright
An Analysis of the Causes of Failure in 57 Consecutive Posterolateral Operative Procedures
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2006; 34(9): 1419 - 1430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.