|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


From the * Department for Trauma, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany and the
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Address correspondence to Wolf Petersen, MD, Klinik für Unfall, Hand, und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität zu Münster, Waldeyerstr 1, D-48149 Münster (e-mail: wolf.petersen{at}ukmuenster.de).
Background: Flexible meniscus repair devices are designed to combine the benefits of rigid all-inside meniscus anchors with the biomechanical properties of sutures.
Hypothesis: Stiffness and pull-out strength of flexible all-inside suture anchors and conventional sutures under cyclic loading conditions will be comparable.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: In 50 fresh frozen bovine menisci, artificial meniscus lesions were repaired with different meniscus fixation techniques: horizontal and vertical FasT-Fix, RapidLoc, and horizontal and vertical 2-0 Ethibond sutures. The specimens were cycled 1000 times between 5 and 20 N and then loaded to failure.
Results: All devices survived the cyclic loading protocol. There was no significant difference in the displacement between all repair techniques tested (horizontal FasT-Fix, 6.23 mm; vertical FasT-Fix, 5.34 mm; RapidLoc, 6.84 mm; horizontal 2-0 Ethibond, 6.03 mm; vertical 2-0 Ethibond, 5.61 mm (P > .05). Vertical and horizontal FasT-Fix suture anchors had a significantly higher stiffness and pull-out strength (94.1 N and 80.8 N, respectively) than did horizontal sutures (50.2 N) and RapidLoc devices (30.3 N) (P > .05).
Conclusions: In this study, flexible all-inside meniscus anchors (FasT-Fix) had higher pull-out strength than did conventional vertical suture techniques. Biomechanical characteristics of the flexible RapidLoc are comparable to those of horizontal sutures.
Clinical Relevance: Flexible all-inside meniscus repair devices are an alternative to conventional suture techniques.
Key Words: meniscus fixation techniques meniscus anchors biodegradable implants cyclic loading anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. S. Quinby, S. R. Golish, J. A. Hart, and D. R. Diduch All-Inside Meniscal Repair Using a New Flexible, Tensionable Device Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2006; 34(8): 1281 - 1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Zantop, K. Temmig, A. Weimann, A. K. Eggers, M. J. Raschke, and W. Petersen Elongation and Structural Properties of Meniscal Repair Using Suture Techniques in Distraction and Shear Force Scenarios: Biomechanical Evaluation Using a Cyclic Loading Protocol Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2006; 34(5): 799 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Chang, J. Nyland, D. N. M. Caborn, and R. Burden Biomechanical Evaluation of Meniscal Repair Systems: A Comparison of the Meniscal Viper Repair System, the Vertical Mattress FasT-Fix Device, and Vertical Mattress Ethibond Sutures Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2005; 33(12): 1846 - 1852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |