AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on February 8, 2005, doi:10.1177/0363546504269590
This version was published on March 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/3/335    most recent
0363546504269590v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fithian, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Daniel, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fithian, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Daniel, D. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Injury
Right arrow Reconstruction
Right arrow Nonoperative
Right arrow Operative
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 33:335-346 (2005)
© 2005 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Prospective Trial of a Treatment Algorithm for the Management of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knee

Donald C. Fithian, MD*, Elizabeth W. Paxton, MA, Mary Lou Stone, RPT, William F. Luetzow, MD, Rick P. Csintalan, MD, Daniel Phelan, MD and Dale M. Daniel, MD

From the Southern California Permanente Medical Group, El Cajon, California

* Address correspondence to Donald C. Fithian, MD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 250 Travelodge Drive, El Cajon, CA 92020 (e-mail: donald.c.fithian{at}kp.org).

Background: Specific guidelines for operative versus nonoperative management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries do not yet exist.

Hypothesis: Surgical risk factors can be used to indicate whether reconstruction or conservative management is best for an individual patient.

Study Design: Prospective nonrandomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: Patients were classified as high, moderate, or low risk using preinjury sports participation and knee laxity measurements. Early anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (within 3 months of injury) was recommended to high-risk patients and conservative care to low-risk patients. It was recommended that moderate-risk patients have either early reconstruction or conservative care, according to the day of presentation. Assessment of subjective outcomes, activity, physical measurements, and radiographs was performed at mean follow-up of 6.6 years.

Results: Early phase conservative management resulted in more late phase meniscus surgery than did early phase reconstruction at all risk levels (high risk, 25% vs 6.5%; moderate risk, 37% vs 7.7%, P = .01; low risk, 16% vs 0%). Early- and late-reconstruction patients’ Tegner scores increased from presurgery to follow-up (P < .001) but did not return to preinjury levels. Early-reconstruction patients had higher rates of degenerative change on radiographs than did nonreconstruction patients (P < .05).

Conclusions: Early phase reconstruction reduced late phase knee laxity, risk of symptomatic instability, and the risk of late meniscus tear and surgery. Moderate- and high-risk patients had similar rates of late phase injury and surgery. Reconstruction did not prevent the appearance of late degenerative changes on radiographs. Relationship between bone contusion on initial magnetic resonance images and the finding of degenerative changes on follow-up radiographs were not detected. The treatment algorithm used in this study was effective in predicting risk of late phase knee surgery.

Key Words: anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) • outcomes • nonoperative • natural history • prospective controlled study • treatment algorithm




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
P. Neuman, M. Englund, I. Kostogiannis, T. Friden, H. Roos, and L. E. Dahlberg
Prevalence of Tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis 15 Years After Nonoperative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2008; 36(9): 1717 - 1725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
I. Kostogiannis, E. Ageberg, P. Neuman, L. E. Dahlberg, T. Friden, and H. Roos
Clinically Assessed Knee Joint Laxity as a Predictor for Reconstruction After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Prospective Study of 100 Patients Treated With Activity Modification and Rehabilitation
Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1528 - 1533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
F. H. Fu, W. Shen, J. S. Starman, N. Okeke, and J. J. Irrgang
Primary Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Preliminary 2-Year Prospective Study
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2008; 36(7): 1263 - 1274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
W. J. Hurd, M. J. Axe, and L. Snyder-Mackler
A 10-Year Prospective Trial of a Patient Management Algorithm and Screening Examination for Highly Active Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Part 2, Determinants of Dynamic Knee Stability
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2008; 36(1): 48 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
L. S. Lohmander, P. M. Englund, L. L. Dahl, and E. M. Roos
The Long-term Consequence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscus Injuries: Osteoarthritis
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2007; 35(10): 1756 - 1769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
I. Kostogiannis, E. Ageberg, P. Neuman, L. Dahlberg, T. Friden, and H. Roos
Activity Level and Subjective Knee Function 15 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Prospective, Longitudinal Study of Nonreconstructed Patients
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2007; 35(7): 1135 - 1143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. S. Jordan, L. E. DeFrate, K. W. Nha, R. Papannagari, T. J. Gill, and G. Li
The In Vivo Kinematics of the Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament During Weightbearing Knee Flexion
Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2007; 35(4): 547 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. Papannagari, T. J. Gill, L. E. DeFrate, J. M. Moses, A. J. Petruska, and G. Li
In Vivo Kinematics of the Knee After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Clinical and Functional Evaluation
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2006; 34(12): 2006 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
K Button, R van Deursen, P Price, E D de Bruin, and D Rosenbaum
Classification of functional recovery of anterior cruciate ligament copers, non-copers, and adapters * COMMENTARY
Br. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2006; 40(10): 853 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
L. Y. Griffin, M. J. Albohm, E. A. Arendt, R. Bahr, B. D. Beynnon, M. DeMaio, R. W. Dick, L. Engebretsen, W. E. Garrett Jr, J. A. Hannafin, et al.
Understanding and Preventing Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Review of the Hunt Valley II Meeting, January 2005
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2006; 34(9): 1512 - 1532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. Li, J. M. Moses, R. Papannagari, N. P. Pathare, L. E. DeFrate, and T. J. Gill
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency Alters the In Vivo Motion of the Tibiofemoral Cartilage Contact Points in Both the Anteroposterior and Mediolateral Directions
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2006; 88(8): 1826 - 1834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.