AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on August 10, 2005, doi:10.1177/0363546505275148
This version was published on November 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/11/1658    most recent
0363546505275148v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fu, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Micheli, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fu, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Micheli, L. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Chondral/cartilage
Right arrow Knee
Right arrow Operative
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 33:1658-1666 (2005)
© 2005 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Debridement for Treatment of Full-Thickness Chondral Defects of the Knee

An Observational Cohort Study With 3-Year Follow-up

Freddie H. Fu, MD*, David Zurakowski, PhD{dagger},{ddagger}, Jon E. Browne, MD§, Bert Mandelbaum, MD||, Christoph Erggelet, MD, PhD, J. Bruce Moseley, Jr, MD#, Allen F. Anderson, MD** and Lyle J. Micheli, MD{dagger}{dagger}

From the * University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, {ddagger} Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, the § Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Program, University of Missouri–Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, || Santa Monica Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Research Foundation, Santa Monica, California, the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany, # Baylor Sports Medicine Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, the ** Sports Medicine Fellowship, Tennessee Sports Alliance/The Lipscomb Clinic, Nashville, Tennessee, and the {dagger}{dagger} Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

{dagger} Address correspondence to David Zurakowski, PhD, Director of Biostatistics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 (e-mail: david.zurakowski{at}childrens.harvard.edu).

Background: Studies that compare the effectiveness of different cartilage repair treatments are needed to update treatment algorithms.

Hypothesis: Autologous chondrocyte implantation provides greater improvement in overall condition score than does debridement at a minimum of 3 years’ follow-up.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Cohorts for debridement and autologous chondrocyte implantation each included 58 Cartilage Repair Registry patients who met study criteria. A retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected baseline and follow-up data.

Results: Patients in the autologous chondrocyte implantation and debridement groups had similar demographics and chondral lesions at baseline. However, more autologous chondrocyte implantation patients failed a previous debridement or marrow stimulation procedure than did debridement patients. Follow-up outcome assessments were completed by 54 autologous chondrocyte implantation patients and 42 debridement patients. Eighty-one percent of the autologous chondrocyte implantation patients and 60% of the debridement patients reported median improvements of 5 points and 2 points, respectively, in the overall condition score. Autologous chondrocyte implantation patients also reported greater improvements in the median pain and swelling scores than did debridement patients. The treatment failure rate was the same for both autologous chondrocyte implantation and debridement patients. Eighteen autologous chondrocyte implantation patients and 1 debridement patient had at least 1 subsequent operation.

Conclusion: Although patients treated with debridement for symptomatic, large, focal, chondral defects of the distal femur had some functional improvement at follow-up, patients who received autologous chondrocyte implantations obtained higher levels of knee function and had greater relief from pain and swelling at 3 years.

Key Words: autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) • debridement • chondral defects • outcomes • knee




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
D. B. F. Saris, J. Vanlauwe, J. Victor, M. Haspl, M. Bohnsack, Y. Fortems, B. Vandekerckhove, K. F. Almqvist, T. Claes, F. Handelberg, et al.
Characterized Chondrocyte Implantation Results in Better Structural Repair When Treating Symptomatic Cartilage Defects of the Knee in a Randomized Controlled Trial Versus Microfracture
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2008; 36(2): 235 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. Mandelbaum, J. E. Browne, F. Fu, L. J. Micheli, J. B. Moseley Jr, C. Erggelet, and A. F. Anderson
Treatment Outcomes of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Full-Thickness Articular Cartilage Defects of the Trochlea
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2007; 35(6): 915 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. Treme, J. A. Hart, and M. D. Miller
What's New in Sports Medicine
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2007; 89(3): 686 - 696.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. M. Braun, C. E. Zinderman, J. J. Wood, M. A. Malek, F. J. Frassica, J. A. Polder, and T. R. Cote

J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2006; 88(11): 2539 - 2539.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.