AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on August 10, 2005, doi:10.1177/0363546505275487
This version was published on November 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/11/1647    most recent
0363546505275487v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nixon, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nixon, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal studies
Right arrow Biomechanics
Right arrow Degenerative Joint Disease
Right arrow Chondral/cartilage
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 33:1647-1653 (2005)
© 2005 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Biochemical and Biomechanical Properties of Lesion and Adjacent Articular Cartilage After Chondral Defect Repair in an Equine Model

Eric J. Strauss, MD*,{dagger}, Laurie R. Goodrich, DVM, PhD{ddagger}, Chih-Tung Chen, PhD{dagger}, Chisa Hidaka, MD{dagger} and Alan J. Nixon, BVSc, MS{ddagger}

From the {dagger} Laboratory for Soft Tissue Research, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, and the {ddagger} Comparative Orthopaedics Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

* Address correspondence to Eric J. Strauss, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021 (e-mail: ejs2002{at}med.cornell.edu).

Background: Chondral defects may lead to degradative changes in the surrounding cartilage, predisposing patients to developing osteoarthritis.

Purpose: To quantify changes in the biomechanical and biochemical properties of the articular cartilage adjacent to chondral defects after experimental defect repair.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Specimens were harvested from tissue within (lesion), immediately adjacent to, and at a distance from (remote area) a full-thickness cartilage defect 8 months after cartilage repair with genetically modified chondrocytes expressing insulin-like growth factor–I or unmodified, control chondrocytes. Biomechanical properties, including instantaneous Young’s and equilibrium aggregate moduli, were determined by confined compression testing. Biochemical properties, such as water and proteoglycan content, were also measured.

Results: The instantaneous Young’s modulus, equilibrium modulus, and proteoglycan content increased, whereas water content decreased with increasing distance from the repaired lesion. The instantaneous Young’s and equilibrium moduli of the adjacent articular cartilage were 80% and 50% that of remote area samples, respectively, whereas water content increased 0.9% and proteoglycan content was decreased by 35%. No significant changes in biomechanical and biochemical properties were found either in the lesion tissue or in adjacent cartilage with genetic modification of the chondrocytes.

Conclusion: Articular cartilage adjacent to repaired chondral defects showed significant remodeling 8 months after chondral defect repair, regardless of whether genetically modified or unmodified cells were implanted.

Clinical Relevance: Changes in the biochemical and biomechanical properties of articular cartilage adjacent to repaired chondral defects may represent remodeling as part of an adaptive process or degeneration secondary to an altered distribution of joint forces. Quantification of these changes could provide important parameters for assessing progress after operative chondral defect repair.

Key Words: chondral defect repair • biochemical and biomechanical properties • articular cartilage • confined compression testing




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
M. R. Safran, H. Kim, and S. Zaffagnini
The Use of Scaffolds in the Management of Articular Cartilage Injury
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., June 1, 2008; 16(6): 306 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
L. R. Goodrich, C. Hidaka, P. D. Robbins, C. H. Evans, and A. J. Nixon
Genetic modification of chondrocytes with insulin-like growth factor-1 enhances cartilage healing in an equine model
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2007; 89-B(5): 672 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.