AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on August 16, 2004, doi:10.1177/0363546503262645
This version was published on October 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/7/1702    most recent
0363546503262645v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howell, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lawhorn, K. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howell, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lawhorn, K. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Injury
Right arrow Reconstruction
Right arrow Knee
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 32:1702-1710 (2004)
© 2004 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Gravity Reduces the Tibia When Using a Tibial Guide That Targets the Intercondylar Roof

Stephen M. Howell, MD*,{dagger} and Keith W. Lawhorn, MD{ddagger}

From the {dagger} University of California, Davis, Davis, California, and {ddagger} Malcolm Grow Medical Center, Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland

* Address correspondence to Stephen M. Howell, MD, 8100 Timber-lake Way, Suite F, Sacramento, CA 95823 (e-mail: sebhowell{at}mac.com).

Background: Reduction of the tibia relative to the femur with the knee in maximum extension is required to correctly position the tibial tunnel in the sagittal plane when using a guide that targets the intercondylar roof. The authors found no studies that determined (1) whether gravity reduces the tibia and (2) whether roof impingement is prevented without a roofplasty and without positioning the tibial tunnel too posteriorly.

Methods: The position of the tibia relative to the femur was measured from a lateral radiograph of the treated knee in maximum extension with and without the tibial guide and of the contralateral normal knee in extension in single-leg stance (control).

Results: The position of the tibia with and without the tibial guide was not different (P = .33, not significant) and was only 0.7 mm more posterior than the control knee (P = .0075). A roofplasty was not required, and the clearance was 2 mm or less.

Conclusion: Gravity reduces the tibia on the femur when using a guide that targets the intercondylar roof. The use of a tibial guide that targets the intercondylar roof prevents roof impingement without a roofplasty and without positioning the tibial tunnel too posteriorly.

Key Words: anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) • tibial tunnel







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.