|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||

,*
From the * Bioengineering Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, and the
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Address correspondence to Guoan Li, PhD, 55 Fruit Street, GRJ 1215, Boston, MA 02114 (e-mail: gli1{at}partners.org).
Purpose: To measure the biomechanical effect of the surgical capsulotomy made during a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the tibial inlay technique.
Hypothesis: The posterior capsule contributes to posterior tibial stability.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory experiment.
Methods: Six knee specimens were tested on a robotic testing system from 0° to 120° of flexion with the posterior cruciate ligament intact and resected and with a posterior capsulotomy identical to that performed during tibial inlay reconstruction (sham surgery). A longitudinal incision with medial and lateral soft tissue stripping sufficient to mount an inlay bone block and pass an Achilles tendon graft into the knee was made in the oblique popliteal ligament, muscle belly of the popliteus, and posterior capsule. The posterior tibial translation was measured under a posterior tibial load of 130 N at multiple flexion angles.
Results: Capsulotomy increased the posterior laxity compared with the posterior cruciate ligamentresected knee at every flexion angle. An additional 0.97 ± 0.48 mm, 0.65 ± 0.47 mm, 0.56 ± 0.33 mm, 0.48 ± 0.38 mm, and 0.94 ± 0.60 mm of posterior laxity was recorded at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of flexion, respectively. These values were all statistically significant (P < .001).
Conclusions: A posterior capsulotomy alone, without associated posteromedial or posterolateral disruption, produces additional posterior tibial translation in vitro compared with posterior cruciate ligamentdeficient knee with intact capsule.
Clinical Relevance: Damage to the posterior capsule may contribute to the residual posterior laxity noted clinically after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Key Words: knee capsule posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction posterior stability tibial inlay
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. C. Covey, A. A. Sapega, and R. H. Riffenburgh The Effects of Sequential Sectioning of Defined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Fiber Regions on Translational Knee Motion Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2008; 36(3): 480 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Campbell, A. Torrie, A. Hecker, and J. K. Sekiya Comparison of Tibial Graft Fixation Between Simulated Arthroscopic and Open Inlay Techniques for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2007; 35(10): 1731 - 1738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Ahn, J. H. Wang, S. H. Lee, J. C. Yoo, and W. J. Jeon Increasing the Distance Between the Posterior Cruciate Ligament and the Popliteal Neurovascular Bundle by a Limited Posterior Capsular Release During Arthroscopic Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Angiographic Study Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2007; 35(5): 787 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |