AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on July 20, 2004, doi:10.1177/0363546503262171
This version was published on September 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/6/1474    most recent
0363546503262171v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shelbourne, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shelbourne, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, B. C.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 32:1474-1478 (2004)
© 2004 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Effects of Patellar Tendon Width and Preoperative Quadriceps Strength on Strength Return After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Ipsilateral Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft

K. Donald Shelbourne, MD* and Brent C. Johnson, MD

From the Methodist Sports Medicine Center, Indianapolis, Indiana

* Address correspondence to K. Donald Shelbourne, MD, The Shelbourne Clinic at Methodist Hospital, 1815 N. Capitol Avenue, Suite 530, Indianapolis, IN 46202 (e-mail: tgray{at}aclmd.com).

Background: Strength return after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction varies greatly.

Hypothesis: Patients with small patellar tendons and weak preoperative quadriceps muscle strength would not be able to regain full strength.

Study Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

Methods: Patellar tendon widths for 540 patients were measured intraoperatively and grouped according to size (small, 20–26 mm; medium, 27–30 mm; large, 31–36 mm). Strength measured preoperatively was determined by dividing the torque value of the injured leg by the torque value of the noninjured leg. Strength after surgery was determined by dividing the postoperative value in the anterior cruciate ligament–reconstructed leg by the preoperative value of the uninjured leg.

Results: At 1, 2, and 3 months after surgery, patients with large tendons had statistically significantly better strength than patients with small and medium tendons (P < .01), but this difference was not significant 2 years after operation. At all times after surgery, patients with preoperative strength >90% had statistically significantly better strength than patients with preoperative strength <75% (P < .01). At 3 months after surgery, patients with good preoperative strength and large tendons had a mean postoperative strength of 79% compared with 62% for patients who had poor preoperative strength and small tendons (P < .001).

Conclusions: If patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have a weak leg before surgery and small patellar tendons, their ability to regain full strength after surgery may be compromised, especially in the first year after surgery.

Key Words: anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) • quadriceps strength • tendon width






HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.