HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 32/4/967    most recent 0363546503261706v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Garretson, R. B. Articles by Cole, B. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Garretson, R. B., III Articles by Cole, B. J. Related Collections Biomechanics Knee

Contact Pressure at Osteochondral Donor Sites in the Patellofemoral Joint

Ralph B. Garretson, III, MD^*, Leonid I. Katolik, MD, Nikhil Verma, MD, Paul R. Beck, MD, Bernard R. Bach, MD and Brian J. Cole, MD, MBA^,

From the ^* Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the Department of Orthopedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Address correspondence to Brian J. Cole, Rush University Medical Center, Midwest Orthopaedics, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 1063, Chicago, IL 60612.

Background: The lowest contact pressure point is presumed to be the best site to harvest an osteochondral plug and minimize morbidity.

Hypothesis: Patellofemoral contact pressures are not uniform and are lowest along the medial patellofemoral articulation.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Seven cadaveric knees were tested with an electroresistive, dynamic pressure sensor placed onto the femoral side of the patellofemoral joint. The extensor mechanism was loaded with 89.1 N and 178.2 N, and the knee was manually cycled 3 times (0°–105°) per load. Mean trochlear pressures were calculated.

Results: Mean contact pressures were greatest in the central trochlea (5.80 kgf/cm²), followed by the lateral (2.56 kgf/cm²) and medial trochlea (1.60 kgf/cm²) at 89.1 N (P < .05). At 178.2 N, pressures increased to 9.47, 5.81, and 2.75 kgf/cm², respectively (P < .05). Lateral trochlear pressures decreased moving distally from 1.25 to 0.50 kgf/cm² at 89.1 N and 4.57 to 1.29 kgf/cm² at 178.2 N.

Conclusions: Contact pressures are lowest along the medial trochlea and decrease distally along the lateral trochlea.

Clinical Relevance: Osteochondral plugs from the medial femoral trochlea may be desirable if trochlear size permits. If harvesting from the lateral femoral trochlea, consider harvesting distally near the sulcus terminalis.

Key Words: osteochondral transplantation • patellofemoral contact pressure • donor morbidity

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Beck, N. A. T. Brown, P. E. Greis, and R. T. Burks Patellofemoral Contact Pressures and Lateral Patellar Translation After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2007; 35(9): 1557 - 1563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. McCulloch, R. W. Kang, M. H. Sobhy, J. K. Hayden, and B. J. Cole Prospective Evaluation of Prolonged Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Condyle: Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2007; 35(3): 411 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Reddy, D. I. Pedowitz, S. G. Parekh, B. J. Sennett, and E. Okereke The Morbidity Associated With Osteochondral Harvest From Asymptomatic Knees for the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2007; 35(1): 80 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. R. Beck, A. L. Thomas, J. Farr, P. B. Lewis, and B. J. Cole Trochlear Contact Pressures After Anteromedialization of the Tibial Tubercle Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2005; 33(11): 1710 - 1715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Alford and B. J. Cole Cartilage Restoration, Part 2: Techniques, Outcomes, and Future Directions Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2005; 33(3): 443 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Alford and B. J. Cole Cartilage Restoration, Part 1: Basic Science, Historical Perspective, Patient Evaluation, and Treatment Options Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2005; 33(2): 295 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]