AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on March 11, 2004, doi:10.1177/0363546503261699
This version was published on April 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/3/681    most recent
0363546503261699v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pötzl, W.
Right arrow Articles by Steinbeck, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pötzl, W.
Right arrow Articles by Steinbeck, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal studies
Right arrow Biomechanics
Right arrow Shoulder
Right arrow Laser/Radiofrequency energy
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 32:681-687 (2004)
© 2004 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Does Immobilization After Radiofrequency-Induced Shrinkage Influence the Biomechanical Properties of Collagenous Tissue?

An In Vivo Rabbit Study

Wolfgang Pötzl, MD*, Till Heusner, Philipp Kümpers, Björn Marquardt, MD and Jörn Steinbeck, MD

From the Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany

* Address correspondence to Wolfgang Pötzl, University Hospital Münster, Department of Orthopaedics, Albert Schweitzer Str. 33, 48149 Münster, Germany (e-mail: poetzl{at}uni-muenster.de).

Background: Despite widespread use of radiofrequency-induced shrinkage of collagenous tissue, there have been no animal studies on the effects of postoperative immobilization on the biomechanical behavior of shrunken tissue.

Purpose: To examine the role of postoperative immobilization after radiofrequency-induced shrinkage, with special emphasis on the biomechanical properties of shrunken collagenous tissue.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: One patellar tendon of 66 New Zealand White rabbits was shrunk. Six rabbits were sacrificed immediately after surgery. Twenty rabbits were not immobilized, twenty were immobilized for 3 weeks, and twenty were immobilized for 6 weeks. The biomechanical parameters failure strength, stiffness, and relaxation were tested.

Results: Nine weeks after surgery, biomechanical parameters were still low compared to control tendons. Shrunken tendons did not reach levels of normal tissue at any time after surgery, regardless of whether the animals had been immobilized. According to time-related development, all biomechanical parameters had the lowest levels 3 weeks after surgery. Immobilized tendons demonstrated a better and faster recovery than nonimmobilized tendons compared to the immediate postoperative level.

Conclusion: Postoperative immobilization supports recovery of biomechanical properties after shrinkage. Despite immobilization, biomechanical properties of shrunken tissue did not completely reach levels of normal tissue.

Clinical Relevance: Careful rehabilitation is imperative after radiofrequency-induced shrinkage. This animal model supports an immobilization period of at least 6 weeks after surgery.

Key Words: capsular shrinkage • shoulder instability • immobilization • arthroscopic stabilization






HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.