AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on March 11, 2004, doi:10.1177/0363546503261722
This version was published on April 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/3/629    most recent
0363546503261722v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kocher, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kocher, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Reconstruction
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 32:629-634 (2004)
© 2004 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Relationships Between Objective Assessment of Ligament Stability and Subjective Assessment of Symptoms and Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Mininder S. Kocher, MD, MPH*,{dagger},{ddagger}, J. Richard Steadman, MD{dagger}, Karen K. Briggs, MBA{dagger}, William I. Sterett, MD{dagger} and Richard J. Hawkins, MD{dagger}

From the {dagger} Steadman Hawkins Sports Medicine Foundation, Vail, Colorado, and {ddagger} Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

* Address correspondence to Mininder S Kocher, MD, MPH, Children’s Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 (e-mail: mininder.kocher{at}childrens.harvard.edu).

Background: Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have not been established.

Hypothesis: Relationships exist between objective and subjective assessments after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Study Design: Case series.

Methods: Patients (N = 202) undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 2-year minimum follow-up were studied. Objective variables of ligament stability at follow-up included instrumented laxity, Lachman examination, and pivot-shift examination. Subjective variables of symptoms at follow-up included pain, swelling, giving way, locking, crepitus, stiffness, and limping. Subjective function at follow-up included walking, squatting, stair climbing, running, cutting, jumping, twisting, activity limitation, sports level, activities of daily living level, work level, knee function, sports participation, Lysholm score, and satisfaction with outcome.

Results: Instrumented knee laxity and Lachman examination had no significant (P > .05) relationships with any subjective variables of symptoms and function. Pivot-shift examination had significant associations with satisfaction (P = .03), partial giving way (P = .01), full giving way (P = .01), difficulty cutting (P = .01), difficulty twisting (P = .01), activity limitation (P = .01), overall knee function (P = .03), sports participation (P = .02), and Lysholm score (P = .01).

Conclusions: The pivot-shift examination may be a better measure of "functional instability" than instrumented knee laxity or Lachman examination after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Key Words: anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) • outcomes assessment • ligament stability • disability • impairment




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. L. Markolf, S. Park, S. R. Jackson, and D. R. McAllister
Simulated Pivot-Shift Testing with Single and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2008; 90(8): 1681 - 1689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
I. Kostogiannis, E. Ageberg, P. Neuman, L. E. Dahlberg, T. Friden, and H. Roos
Clinically Assessed Knee Joint Laxity as a Predictor for Reconstruction After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Prospective Study of 100 Patients Treated With Activity Modification and Rehabilitation
Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1528 - 1533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
W. G. Rodkey, K. E. DeHaven, W. H. Montgomery III, C. L. Baker Jr., C. L. Beck Jr., S. E. Hormel, J. R. Steadman, B. J. Cole, and K. K. Briggs
Comparison of the Collagen Meniscus Implant with Partial Meniscectomy. A Prospective Randomized Trial
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2008; 90(7): 1413 - 1426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
P Renstrom, A Ljungqvist, E Arendt, B Beynnon, T Fukubayashi, W Garrett, T Georgoulis, T E Hewett, R Johnson, T Krosshaug, et al.
Non-contact ACL injuries in female athletes: an International Olympic Committee current concepts statement
Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 42(6): 394 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
D. P. Magit, M. McGarry, J. E. Tibone, and T. Q. Lee
Comparison of Cutaneous and Transosseous Electromagnetic Position Sensors in the Assessment of Tibial Rotation in a Cadaveric Model
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2008; 36(5): 971 - 977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. E. Steiner, M. M. Murray, and S. A. Rodeo
Strategies to Improve Anterior Cruciate Ligament Healing and Graft Placement
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2008; 36(1): 176 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
P. Cuomo, K. R. B. S. Rama, A. M. J. Bull, and A. A. Amis
The Effects of Different Tensioning Strategies on Knee Laxity and Graft Tension After Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2007; 35(12): 2083 - 2090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
Y. Hoshino, R. Kuroda, K. Nagamune, M. Yagi, K. Mizuno, M. Yamaguchi, H. Muratsu, S. Yoshiya, and M. Kurosaka
In Vivo Measurement of the Pivot-Shift Test in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee Using an Electromagnetic Device
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2007; 35(7): 1098 - 1104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. Chhabra, J. S. Starman, M. Ferretti, A. F. Vidal, T. Zantop, and F. H. Fu
Anatomic, Radiographic, Biomechanical, and Kinematic Evaluation of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Its Two Functional Bundles
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2006; 88(suppl_4): 2 - 10.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. S. George, W. R. Dunn, and K. P. Spindler
Current Concepts Review: Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2006; 34(12): 2026 - 2037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
L. J. Salmon, K. M. Refshauge, V. J. Russell, J. P. Roe, J. Linklater, and L. A. Pinczewski
Gender Differences in Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autograft
Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2006; 34(4): 621 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. F. Anderson and J. J. Irrgang

J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2006; 88(2): 446 - 447.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. C. Montgomery and M. D. Miller
What's New in Sports Medicine
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2005; 87(3): 686 - 694.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.