|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,




From the
Steadman Hawkins Sports Medicine Foundation, Vail, Colorado, and
Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
* Address correspondence to Mininder S Kocher, MD, MPH, Childrens Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Childrens Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 (e-mail: mininder.kocher{at}childrens.harvard.edu).
Background: Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have not been established.
Hypothesis: Relationships exist between objective and subjective assessments after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Study Design: Case series.
Methods: Patients (N = 202) undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 2-year minimum follow-up were studied. Objective variables of ligament stability at follow-up included instrumented laxity, Lachman examination, and pivot-shift examination. Subjective variables of symptoms at follow-up included pain, swelling, giving way, locking, crepitus, stiffness, and limping. Subjective function at follow-up included walking, squatting, stair climbing, running, cutting, jumping, twisting, activity limitation, sports level, activities of daily living level, work level, knee function, sports participation, Lysholm score, and satisfaction with outcome.
Results: Instrumented knee laxity and Lachman examination had no significant (P > .05) relationships with any subjective variables of symptoms and function. Pivot-shift examination had significant associations with satisfaction (P = .03), partial giving way (P = .01), full giving way (P = .01), difficulty cutting (P = .01), difficulty twisting (P = .01), activity limitation (P = .01), overall knee function (P = .03), sports participation (P = .02), and Lysholm score (P = .01).
Conclusions: The pivot-shift examination may be a better measure of "functional instability" than instrumented knee laxity or Lachman examination after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Key Words: anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) outcomes assessment ligament stability disability impairment
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. L. Markolf, S. Park, S. R. Jackson, and D. R. McAllister Simulated Pivot-Shift Testing with Single and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2008; 90(8): 1681 - 1689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kostogiannis, E. Ageberg, P. Neuman, L. E. Dahlberg, T. Friden, and H. Roos Clinically Assessed Knee Joint Laxity as a Predictor for Reconstruction After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Prospective Study of 100 Patients Treated With Activity Modification and Rehabilitation Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1528 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Rodkey, K. E. DeHaven, W. H. Montgomery III, C. L. Baker Jr., C. L. Beck Jr., S. E. Hormel, J. R. Steadman, B. J. Cole, and K. K. Briggs Comparison of the Collagen Meniscus Implant with Partial Meniscectomy. A Prospective Randomized Trial J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2008; 90(7): 1413 - 1426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Renstrom, A Ljungqvist, E Arendt, B Beynnon, T Fukubayashi, W Garrett, T Georgoulis, T E Hewett, R Johnson, T Krosshaug, et al. Non-contact ACL injuries in female athletes: an International Olympic Committee current concepts statement Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 42(6): 394 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Magit, M. McGarry, J. E. Tibone, and T. Q. Lee Comparison of Cutaneous and Transosseous Electromagnetic Position Sensors in the Assessment of Tibial Rotation in a Cadaveric Model Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2008; 36(5): 971 - 977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Steiner, M. M. Murray, and S. A. Rodeo Strategies to Improve Anterior Cruciate Ligament Healing and Graft Placement Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2008; 36(1): 176 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Cuomo, K. R. B. S. Rama, A. M. J. Bull, and A. A. Amis The Effects of Different Tensioning Strategies on Knee Laxity and Graft Tension After Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2007; 35(12): 2083 - 2090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hoshino, R. Kuroda, K. Nagamune, M. Yagi, K. Mizuno, M. Yamaguchi, H. Muratsu, S. Yoshiya, and M. Kurosaka In Vivo Measurement of the Pivot-Shift Test in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee Using an Electromagnetic Device Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2007; 35(7): 1098 - 1104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chhabra, J. S. Starman, M. Ferretti, A. F. Vidal, T. Zantop, and F. H. Fu Anatomic, Radiographic, Biomechanical, and Kinematic Evaluation of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Its Two Functional Bundles J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2006; 88(suppl_4): 2 - 10. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. George, W. R. Dunn, and K. P. Spindler Current Concepts Review: Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2006; 34(12): 2026 - 2037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Salmon, K. M. Refshauge, V. J. Russell, J. P. Roe, J. Linklater, and L. A. Pinczewski Gender Differences in Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autograft Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2006; 34(4): 621 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Anderson and J. J. Irrgang J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2006; 88(2): 446 - 447. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Montgomery and M. D. Miller What's New in Sports Medicine J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2005; 87(3): 686 - 694. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |