| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
|
|
|||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
,From the La Trobe University Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia
Presented at the interim meeting of the AOSSM, Dallas, Texas, February 2002.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Julian A. Feller, FRACS, La Trobe University Medical Centre, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
Background: Patellar and hamstring tendon autografts are the most frequently used graft types for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, but few direct comparisons of outcomes have been published.
Hypothesis: There is no difference in outcome between the two types of reconstruction.
Study Design: Prospective randomized clinical trial.
Methods: After isolated anterior cruciate ligament rupture, 65 patients were randomized to receive either a patellar tendon or a four-strand hamstring tendon graft reconstruction, and results were reviewed at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 36 months.
Results: Pain on kneeling was more common and extension deficits were greater in the patellar tendon group. There were greater quadriceps peak torque deficits in the patellar tendon group at 4 and 8 months but not thereafter. In the hamstring tendon group, active flexion deficits were greater from 8 to 24 months, and KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side differences in anterior knee laxity at 134 N were greater. Cincinnati knee scores, International Knee Documentation Committee ratings, and rates of return to preinjury activity levels were not significantly different between the two groups.
Conclusions: Both grafts resulted in satisfactory functional outcomes but with increased morbidity in the patellar tendon group and increased knee laxity and radiographic femoral tunnel widening in the hamstring tendon group.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. C. Prodromos, F. H. Fu, S. M. Howell, D. H. Johnson, and K. Lawhorn Controversies in Soft-tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Grafts, Bundles, Tunnels, Fixation, and Harvest J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., July 1, 2008; 16(7): 376 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. K. Van de Velde, T. J. Gill, L. E. DeFrate, R. Papannagari, and G. Li The Effect of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency and Reconstruction on the Patellofemoral Joint Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 36(6): 1150 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Liden, T. Movin, L. Ejerhed, N. Papadogiannakis, E. Blomen, K. Hultenby, and J. Kartus A Histological and Ultrastructural Evaluation of the Patellar Tendon 10 Years After Reharvesting Its Central Third Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2008; 36(4): 781 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Steiner, M. M. Murray, and S. A. Rodeo Strategies to Improve Anterior Cruciate Ligament Healing and Graft Placement Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2008; 36(1): 176 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Tuman, D. R. Diduch, L. J. Rubino, J. A. Baumfeld, H. S. Nguyen, and J. M. Hart Predictors for Hamstring Graft Diameter in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2007; 35(11): 1945 - 1949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. A. Rodeo, S. Kawamura, C. B. Ma, X.-h. Deng, P. S. Sussman, P. Hays, and L. Ying The Effect of Osteoclastic Activity on Tendon-to-Bone Healing: An Experimental Study in Rabbits J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2007; 89(10): 2250 - 2259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Lee, S. C. Seong, C. H. Jo, H. S. Han, J. H. An, and M. C. Lee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Use of Autologous Quadriceps Tendon Graft J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2007; 89(suppl_3): 116 - 126. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Kostogiannis, E. Ageberg, P. Neuman, L. Dahlberg, T. Friden, and H. Roos Activity Level and Subjective Knee Function 15 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Prospective, Longitudinal Study of Nonreconstructed Patients Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2007; 35(7): 1135 - 1143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. W. Wright, W. R. Dunn, A. Amendola, J. T. Andrish, J. Bergfeld, C. C. Kaeding, R. G. Marx, E. C. McCarty, R. D. Parker, M. Wolcott, et al. Risk of Tearing the Intact Anterior Cruciate Ligament in the Contralateral Knee and Rupturing the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft During the First 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective MOON Cohort Study Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2007; 35(7): 1131 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Liden, L. Ejerhed, N. Sernert, G. Laxdal, and J. Kartus Patellar Tendon or Semitendinosus Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Study With a 7-Year Follow-up Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2007; 35(5): 740 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Keays, J. E. Bullock-Saxton, A. C. Keays, P. A. Newcombe, and M. I. Bullock A 6-Year Follow-up of the Effect of Graft Site on Strength, Stability, Range of Motion, Function, and Joint Degeneration After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Patellar Tendon Versus Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Graft Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2007; 35(5): 729 - 739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Pinczewski, J. Lyman, L. J. Salmon, V. J. Russell, J. Roe, and J. Linklater A 10-Year Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions With Hamstring Tendon and Patellar Tendon Autograft: A Controlled, Prospective Trial Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2007; 35(4): 564 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Gerber, R. L. Marcus, L. E. Dibble, P. E. Greis, R. T. Burks, and P. C. LaStayo Effects of Early Progressive Eccentric Exercise on Muscle Structure After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2007; 89(3): 559 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. B. Maletis, S. L. Cameron, J. J. Tengan, and R. J. Burchette A Prospective Randomized Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of Patellar Tendon and Quadruple-Strand Semitendinosus/Gracilis Tendons Fixed With Bioabsorbable Interference Screws Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2007; 35(3): 384 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Svensson, T. Movin, L. Rostgard-Christensen, E. Blomen, K. Hultenby, and J. Kartus Ultrastructural Collagen Fibril Alterations in the Patellar Tendon 6 Years After Harvesting Its Central Third Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 301 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Chouliaras, S. Ristanis, C. Moraiti, N. Stergiou, and A. D. Georgoulis Effectiveness of Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament With Quadrupled Hamstrings and Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autografts: An In Vivo Study Comparing Tibial Internal-External Rotation Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 189 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. W. Wright, J. E. Kuhn, A. Amendola, M. H. Jones, and K. P. Spindler Symposium Integrating Evidence-Based Medicine into Clinical Practice J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2007; 89(1): 199 - 205. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Carey, G. R. Huffman, S. G. Parekh, and B. J. Sennett Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries to Running Backs and Wide Receivers in the National Football League Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2006; 34(12): 1911 - 1917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sajovic, V. Vengust, R. Komadina, R. Tavcar, and K. Skaza A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Versus Patellar Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Five-Year Follow-Up Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2006; 34(12): 1933 - 1940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. J. Ciccone II, D. R. Bratton, D. M. Weinstein, and J. J. Elias Viscoelasticity and Temperature Variations Decrease Tension and Stiffness of Hamstring Tendon Grafts Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2006; 88(5): 1071 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Matsumoto, S. Yoshiya, H. Muratsu, M. Yagi, Y. Iwasaki, M. Kurosaka, and R. Kuroda A Comparison of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Bone-Hamstring Tendon-Bone Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2006; 34(2): 213 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Kobayashi, N. Watanabe, Y. Oshima, Y. Kajikawa, M. Kawata, and T. Kubo The Fate of Host and Graft Cells in Early Healing of Bone Tunnel After Tendon Graft Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2005; 33(12): 1892 - 1897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. D. Beynnon, R. J. Johnson, J. A. Abate, B. C. Fleming, and C. E. Nichols Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Part 2 Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2005; 33(11): 1751 - 1767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. D. Beynnon, R. J. Johnson, J. A. Abate, B. C. Fleming, and C. E. Nichols Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Part I Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2005; 33(10): 1579 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Wagner, M. J. Kaab, J. Schallock, N. P. Haas, and A. Weiler Hamstring Tendon Versus Patellar Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Biodegradable Interference Fit Fixation: A Prospective Matched-Group Analysis Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2005; 33(9): 1327 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Montgomery and M. D. Miller What's New in Sports Medicine J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2005; 87(3): 686 - 694. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G Myklebust and R Bahr Return to play guidelines after anterior cruciate ligament surgery Br. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2005; 39(3): 127 - 131. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. E. Webster, J. E. Wittwer, J. O'Brien, and J. A. Feller Gait Patterns After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Are Related to Graft Type Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2005; 33(2): 247 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. P. Spindler, J. E. Kuhn, K. B. Freedman, C. E. Matthews, R. S. Dittus, and F. E. Harrell Jr Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Autograft Choice: Bone-Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring: Does It Really Matter? A Systematic Review Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2004; 32(8): 1986 - 1995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Aglietti, F. Giron, R. Buzzi, F. Biddau, and F. Sasso Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Compared with Double Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Grafts. A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2004; 86(10): 2143 - 2155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. N. Williams, L. Snyder-Mackler, P. J. Barrance, M. J. Axe, and T. S. Buchanan Muscle and Tendon Morphology After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Autologous Semitendinosus-Gracilis Graft J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2004; 86(9): 1936 - 1946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
