|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
,

* Centre for Sports Medicine Research and Education, School of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne
Olympic Park Sports Medicine Centre, Melbourne
Institute of Health Services Research, Monash University, Clayton
|| McConnell and Clements Physiotherapy, Sydney, Australia
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Kay Crossley PhD, Centre for Sports Medicine Research and Education, School of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
Background: Although physical therapy forms the mainstay of nonoperative management for patellofemoral pain, its efficacy has not been established.
Hypothesis: Significantly more pain relief will be achieved from a 6-week regimen of physical therapy than from placebo treatment.
Study Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
Methods: Seventy-one subjects, 40 years of age or younger with patellofemoral pain of 1 month or longer, were randomly allocated to a physical therapy or placebo group. A standardized treatment program consisted of six treatment sessions, once weekly. Physical therapy included quadriceps muscle retraining, patellofemoral joint mobilization, and patellar taping, and daily home exercises. The placebo treatment consisted of sham ultrasound, light application of a nontherapeutic gel, and placebo taping.
Results: Sixty-seven participants completed the trial. The physical therapy group (N = 33) demonstrated significantly greater reduction in the scores for average pain, worst pain, and disability than did the placebo group (N = 34).
Conclusions: A six-treatment, 6-week physical therapy regimen is efficacious for alleviation of patellofemoral pain.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Brushoj, K. Larsen, E. Albrecht-Beste, M. B. Nielsen, F. Loye, and P. Holmich Prevention of Overuse Injuries by a Concurrent Exercise Program in Subjects Exposed to an Increase in Training Load: A Randomized Controlled Trial of 1020 Army Recruits Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2008; 36(4): 663 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Brushoj, P Holmich, M B Nielsen, and E Albrecht-Beste Acute patellofemoral pain: aggravating activities, clinical examination, MRI and ultrasound findings Br. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2008; 42(1): 64 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hambly, V. Bobic, B. Wondrasch, D. Van Assche, and S. Marlovits Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation: Science and Practice Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2006; 34(6): 1020 - 1038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Tyler, S. J. Nicholas, M. J. Mullaney, and M. P. McHugh The Role of Hip Muscle Function in the Treatment of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2006; 34(4): 630 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S M Cowan, P W Hodges, K M Crossley, and K L Bennell Patellar taping does not change the amplitude of electromyographic activity of the vasti in a stair stepping task Br. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2006; 40(1): 30 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. R. Post Anterior Knee Pain: Diagnosis and Treatment J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., December 1, 2005; 13(8): 534 - 543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Witvrouw, L. Danneels, D. Van Tiggelen, T. M. Willems, and D. Cambier Open Versus Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises in Patellofemoral Pain: A 5-Year Prospective Randomized Study Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2004; 32(5): 1122 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
POEM: Physical therapy is probably effective for patellofemoral pain BMJ, March 1, 2003; 326(7387): 0 - 0. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |