|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
,




Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Los Angeles, California
Orthopedic Hospital, Los Angeles, California
Presented at the interim meeting of the AOSSM, Orlando, Florida, March 2000.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to David S. Pereira, MD, 1245 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10128
Background: Rupture of the distal biceps brachii tendon has most commonly been repaired by anatomic reattachment of the tendon to the radial tuberosity by a single- or two-incision approach. Researchers have studied suture anchor attachment through a single incision, but the tendon-suture interface and bone quality have not previously been analyzed.
Hypothesis: Suture anchor repair results in stiffness and tensile strength equal to that of bone-tunnel repair for biceps tendon rupture.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Twelve matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were used. Suture anchor and bone-tunnel tendon repairs were performed in a randomized fashion. Each specimen was loaded to tensile failure. Load-displacement graphs were generated to calculate repair stiffness, yield strength, and ultimate strength. Computed tomography bone density measurements and additional statistical analyses were then performed after grouping the specimens by mode of failure.
Results: The bone-tunnel repair was found to be significantly stiffer in all cases and to have significantly greater tensile strength than the suture anchor repair in the younger, nonosteoporotic elbows.
Conclusions: Suture anchor repairs were not as stiff or strong as bone-tunnel repairs.
Clinical Relevance: Biceps tendon surgery using the traditional two-incision technique yields a stronger and stiffer repair in the typical patient with this injury.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. R. Chavan, T. R. Duquin, and L. J. Bisson Repair of the Ruptured Distal Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1618 - 1624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kettler, M. J. Tingart, J. Lunger, and V. Kuhn Reattachment of the distal tendon of biceps: FACTORS AFFECTING THE FAILURE STRENGTH OF THE REPAIR J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2008; 90-B(1): 103 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Bisson, J. G. de Perio, A. E. Weber, M. T. Ehrensberger, and C. Buyea Is It Safe to Perform Aggressive Rehabilitation After Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using the Modified 2-Incision Approach?: A Biomechanical Study Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2007; 35(12): 2045 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kettler, J. Lunger, V. Kuhn, W. Mutschler, and M. J. Tingart Failure Strengths in Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2007; 35(9): 1544 - 1548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Mazzocca, K. J. Burton, A. A. Romeo, S. Santangelo, D. A. Adams, and R. A. Arciero Biomechanical Evaluation of 4 Techniques of Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Repair Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 252 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Idler, W. H. Montgomery III, D. P. Lindsey, P. A. Badua, G. F. Wynne, and S. A. Yerby Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison of Intact Tendon and 2 Repair Techniques Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2006; 34(6): 968 - 974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Lemos, E. Ebramzedeh, and R. S. Kvitne A New Technique: In Vitro Suture Anchor Fixation Has Superior Yield Strength to Bone Tunnel Fixation for Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2004; 32(2): 406 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Gartsman and S. S. Hasan What's New in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 17, 2003; 85(1): 171 - 181. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |