AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Springer, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Springer, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Imaging Studies
Right arrow Ankle
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 28:864-868 (2000)
© 2000 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

A Prospective Study of Modified Ottawa Ankle Rules in a Military Population

Interobserver Agreement Between Physical Therapists and Orthopaedic Surgeons

Barbara A. Springer, MAJ, SP, USA*, Robert A. Arciero, COL, MC, USA, Joachim J. Tenuta, LTC, MC, USA and Dean C. Taylor, LTC, MC, USA

Departments of Physical Therapy and Orthopaedics, Keller Army Community Hospital, West Point, New York

* Address correspondence and reprint requests to MAJ Barbara A. Springer, 220 Village Commons, Georgetown, TX 78628

To determine the necessity of ankle and foot radiographs, we used modified Ottawa Ankle Rules to evaluate all cadets seen with an acute ankle or midfoot injury at the United States Military Academy. This scoring system determines the need for radiographs. Each patient was independently examined and the decision rules were applied by a physical therapist and an orthopaedic surgeon. Ankle and foot radiographs were obtained for all subjects. Sensitivity, specificity, and the positive predictive value were calculated in 153 patients. There were six clinically significant ankle fractures and three midfoot fractures, for a total incidence of 5.8%. For physical therapists, the sensitivity was 100%, the specificity for ankle injuries was 40%, and the specificity for foot injuries was 79%. For orthopaedic surgeons, the sensitivity was also 100%, the specificity for ankle injuries was 46%, and the specificity for foot injuries was 79%. Interobserver agreement between the orthopaedic surgeons and physical therapists regarding the overall decision to obtain radiographs was high, with a kappa coefficient value of 0.82 for ankle injuries and 0.88 for foot injuries. There were no false-negative results. Use of the modified Ottawa Ankle Rules would have reduced the necessity for ankle and foot radiographs by 46% and 79%, respectively.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L. Kirmit, V. Karatosun, B. Unver, S. Bakirhan, A. Sen, and Z. Gocen
The reliability of hip scoring systems for total hip arthroplasty candidates: assessment by physical therapists
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2005; 19(6): 659 - 661.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
L. M Bachmann, E. Kolb, M. T Koller, J. Steurer, and G. ter Riet
Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review
BMJ, February 22, 2003; 326(7386): 417 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.