|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||

Orthopaedic Clinic of the University of Rome "La Sapienza," Rome, Italy
Presented at the 65th annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 1998.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Paola Papandrea, MD, Via Festo Avieno, 53, 00136 Rome, Italy
In a prospective study, 40 consecutive patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts were examined pre- and postoperatively by ultrasound to investigate the anatomy of the donor site before and after the harvest of the tendons. The patients underwent ultrasonography at 2 weeks and 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. A total of 298 postoperative sonographic evaluations were performed. The semitendinosus tendon was imaged in the sagittal and axial planes: structure and margins were evaluated with the sagittal views; thickness and width were measured with the axial views. In all cases the following sequence of healing was documented: 2 weeks after surgery the semitendinosus tendon site was occupied by an area of increased thickness and decreased echogenicity, suggesting the presence of traumatic edema of the soft tissue surrounding the tenotomy. At 1 month, an irregular hypoechoic structure appeared in a near-anatomic position; at 2 months after surgery, thickness, width, and cross-sectional area of this structure were significantly greater than preoperatively. The amount of regenerated tissue increased up to that seen in the tissue of the 6-month examinations, which also showed a more uniform echostructure. The scans performed at 1 year showed distinct edges and reduction in thickness and width. At 18 and 24 months the echogenicity of the structure occupying the donor site was very similar to that of the normal semitendinosus tendon. However, this structure was clearly identified about 4 cm proximal to the pes anserinus, revealing a more proximal insertion of the regenerated semitendinosus tendon.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Lee, S. C. Seong, C. H. Jo, H. S. Han, J. H. An, and M. C. Lee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Use of Autologous Quadriceps Tendon Graft J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2007; 89(suppl_3): 116 - 126. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Takeda, S. Kashiwaguchi, T. Matsuura, T. Higashida, and A. Minato Hamstring Muscle Function After Tendon Harvest for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evaluation With T2 Relaxation Time of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2006; 34(2): 281 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tadokoro, N. Matsui, M. Yagi, R. Kuroda, M. Kurosaka, and S. Yoshiya Evaluation of Hamstring Strength and Tendon Regrowth After Harvesting for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2004; 32(7): 1644 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. N. Williams, L. Snyder-Mackler, P. J. Barrance, M. J. Axe, and T. S. Buchanan Muscle and Tendon Morphology After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Autologous Semitendinosus-Gracilis Graft J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2004; 86(9): 1936 - 1946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Gill, M. A. Turner, T. C. Battaglia, H. T. Leis, G. Balian, and M. D. Miller Semitendinosus Regrowth: Biochemical, Ultrastructural, and Physiological Characterization of the Regenerate Tendon Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2004; 32(5): 1173 - 1181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. P. H. Charlton, D. A. Randolph Jr., S. Lemos, and C. L. Shields Jr. Clinical Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Quadrupled Hamstring Tendon Graft and Bioabsorbable Interference Screw Fixation Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2003; 31(4): 518 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tashiro, H. Kurosawa, A. Kawakami, A. Hikita, and N. Fukui Influence of Medial Hamstring Tendon Harvest on Knee Flexor Strength after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Detailed Evaluation with Comparison of Single- and Double-Tendon Harvest Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2003; 31(4): 522 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ferretti, F. Conteduca, F. Morelli, and V. Masi Regeneration of the Semitendinosus Tendon after Its Use in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction : A Histologic Study of Three Cases Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2002; 30(2): 204 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |