AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Olszewski, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Olszewski, A. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Imaging Studies
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 27:513-516 (1999)
© 1999 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

The Appearance of Roofplasties on Lateral Hyperextension Radiographs

Mark D. Miller, MD, LTC USAF MC{dagger} and Albert D. Olszewski, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wilford Hall USAF Medical Center, Lackland AFB, Texas

Presented at the 24th annual meeting of the AOSSM, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, July 1998.

{dagger} Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mark D. Miller, MD, 112 Charles Road, San Antonio, TX 78209

Graft impingement by the roof of the intercondylar notch has recently been implicated as a cause of failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Posterior tibial tunnel placement and roofplasties have been advocated to reduce the incidence of graft-roof impingement. Based on our earlier work in this area, we were concerned that lateral hyperextension radiographs, as advocated by Howell and associates to evaluate impingement, did not accurately reflect the extent of roofplasty accomplished intraoperatively. We hypothesized that these radiographs suggested that the grafts were moderately impinged, when, in fact, they were impingement-free. In a cadaver model, we compared radiographs made before and after roofplasty to determine whether there were any resultant changes in the appearance of the intercondylar roof. We found no detectable difference in 70% (14 of 20) of specimens. A second, subtle line superior to the intercondylar line appeared on radiographs in 30% of the specimens. We concluded that postoperative lateral radiographs may fail to show the effect of a roofplasty and can lead to the overdiagnosis of graft-roof impingement.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. Aglietti, F. Giron, R. Buzzi, F. Biddau, and F. Sasso
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Compared with Double Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Grafts. A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2004; 86(10): 2143 - 2155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.