|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
,


* Clinical Investigation Facility, David Grant Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, Sacramento, California
Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Sacramento, California
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, California
|| private practice, Sacramento, California
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Stephen M. Howell, MD, 8100 Timberlake Way, Suite F, Sacramento, CA 95823
The tension in an anterior cruciate ligament graft may not be normal when the femoral tunnel is placed using the single-incision arthroscopic technique because the femoral tunnel is drilled through the tibial tunnel. We hypothesized that the in vivo tensile behavior of the double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft can be normal or abnormal compared with the native anterior cruciate ligament, that the placement and angle of the tibial tunnel can predict the tensile behavior of the graft, that the graft with abnormal tensile behavior is associated with a nonanatomically placed tibial tunnel, and that the tensile behavior of the graft determines the stability of the reconstructed knee at 1 year. Total tension in the graft and knee flexion angle were measured in 14 subjects as the knee was flexed from 0° to 90°. A graft force greater than 40 N at 80° of flexion was considered abnormal. One year after surgery, the angle and position of the tibial tunnel were determined from roentgenograms, and knee stability was measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer. The criteria for anatomic tibial tunnel placement in the sagittal and coronal planes were derived from magnetic resonance images of uninjured knees. The tensile graft behavior was either normal (4 of 14) or abnormal (10 of 14) with the single-incision arthrosopic technique. The angle of the tibial tunnel in the coronal plane was predictive of abnormal tensile behavior. Abnormal tensile behavior occurred in anatomically placed tibial tunnels and was compatible with a stable and functional reconstructed knee at 1 year.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Kondo, K. Yasuda, H. Azuma, Y. Tanabe, and T. Yagi Prospective Clinical Comparisons of Anatomic Double-Bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedures in 328 Consecutive Patients Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2008; 36(9): 1675 - 1687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Pinczewski, L. J. Salmon, W. F. M. Jackson, R. B. P. von Bormann, P. G. Haslam, and S. Tashiro Radiological landmarks for placement of the tunnels in single-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament J Bone Joint Surg Br, February 1, 2008; 90-B(2): 172 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Heming, J. Rand, and M. E. Steiner Anatomical Limitations of Transtibial Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2007; 35(10): 1708 - 1715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Karchin, M.L. Hull, and S.M. Howell Initial Tension and Anterior Load-Displacement Behavior of High-Stiffness Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Constructs J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2004; 86(8): 1675 - 1683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Simmons, S. M. Howell, and M. L. Hull Effect of the Angle of the Femoral and Tibial Tunnels in the Coronal Plane and Incremental Excision of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament on Tension of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft: An in Vitro Study J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 28, 2003; 85(6): 1018 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Howell, M. E. Gittins, J. E. Gottlieb, S. M. Traina, and T. M. Zoellner The Relationship between the Angle of the Tibial Tunnel in the Coronal Plane and Loss of Flexion and Anterior Laxity after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2001; 29(5): 567 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |