HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bak, K. Articles by Magnusson, S. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bak, K. Articles by Magnusson, S. P.

Shoulder Strength and Range of Motion in Symptomatic and Pain-Free Elite Swimmers

Department of Orthopaedics, Division of Sports Traumatology, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen

S. Peter Magnusson, PT

Team Denmark Test Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

To evaluate differences in shoulder strength and range of motion between painful and pain-free shoulders we examined two matched groups of athletes. Fifteen competitive swimmers were allocated to two groups. Group 1 consisted of seven swimmers with unilateral shoulder pain related to swimming (Neer and Welsh phase I to II). The control group (Group 2) consisted of eight swimmers with no present or previous history of shoulder pain. Concentric and eccentric internal rota tional torques were reduced in painful shoulders in between-group comparisons as well as in side-to-side comparisons. The decrease in internal rotational torque resulted in significantly greater concentric and eccentric external-to-internal rotational strength ratios of the painful shoulder in Group 1 swimmers compared with the controls. Furthermore, the functional ratio (ec centric external rotation:concentric internal rotation) was significantly greater in the painful shoulder in both between-group and side-to-side comparisons. Both groups of swimmers exhibited increased external range of motion and reduced internal range of motion compared with normalized data, but no between-group or side-to-side differences were detected. Our findings suggest that prevention or rehabilitation of swimmer's shoulder might not solely involve strengthening of the external rotators of the shoulder joint. Attention might also be drawn toward correction of a possible deficit in internal rotational strength. Changes in shoulder range of motion seem unrelated to the occurrence of shoul der pain.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. A. Borsa, J. S. Scibek, J. A. Jacobson, and K. Meister Sonographic Stress Measurement of Glenohumeral Joint Laxity in Collegiate Swimmers and Age-Matched Controls Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2005; 33(7): 1077 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Noffal Isokinetic Eccentric-to-Concentric Strength Ratios of the Shoulder Rotator Muscles in Throwers and Nonthrowers Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2003; 31(4): 537 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Sauers, P. A. Borsa, D. E. Herling, and R. D. Stanley Instrumented Measurement of Glenohumeral Joint Laxity and its Relationship to Passive Range of Motion and Generalized Joint Laxity Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2001; 29(2): 143 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]