AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gelb, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Torg, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gelb, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Torg, J. S.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 24:99-103 (1996)
© 1996 SAGE Publications

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Knee Disorders

Clinical Value and Cost-Effectiveness in a Sports Medicine Practice

Howard J. Gelb, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Steven G. Glasgow, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Alexander A. Sapega, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Joseph S. Torg, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

To prospectively evaluate the clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in a referral sports medicine practice, we performed a three-part study. First, we asked 72 consecutive patients a series of clinically relevant questions regarding the ordering of their magnetic resonance imaging scans. Second, we asked the treating physicians at our center if the mag netic resonance imaging findings changed the diagno sis or treatment. Third, we compared the clinical eval uation with the findings on magnetic resonance imaging scans for 37 patients who had arthroscopic confirmation. From the physician's perspective, in only three cases would the results of the scan have changed the diagnosis. Information from the scans was judged to contribute to patient treatment in only 14 of 72 patients. Finally, comparison of clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging findings with findings during arthroscopic procedures showed that clinical evaluation had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, whereas magnetic resonance imaging was 95% sen sitive and 88% specific. For isolated meniscal lesions, the clinical assessment had a sensitivity and specificity of 91 % compared with 82% and 87%, respectively, for magnetic resonance imaging. For evaluation of articu lar surface damage, the predictive value of a positive test was 100% for clinical assessment and 33% for the




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cleveland Clinic Journal of MedicineHome page
M. KOPLAS, J. SCHILS, and M. SUNDARAM
The painful knee: Choosing thea right imaging test
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, May 1, 2008; 75(5): 377 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. J. Luhmann, M. Schootman, J. E. Gordon, and R. W. Wright
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee in Children and Adolescents. Its Role in Clinical Decision-Making
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2005; 87(3): 497 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. L. Jackson, P. G. O'Malley, and K. Kroenke
Evaluation of Acute Knee Pain in Primary Care
Ann Intern Med, October 7, 2003; 139(7): 575 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. S. Kocher, J. DiCanzio, D. Zurakowski, and L. J. Micheli
Dignostic Performance of Clinical Examination and Selective Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Intraarticular Knee Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2001; 29(3): 292 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
S. Bollen
Epidemiology of knee injuries: diagnosis and triage
Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2000; 34(3): 227 - 228.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TraumaHome page
M. W Brown and R. C Brown
Athletic injuries
Trauma, October 1, 1999; 1(4): 271 - 278.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. J. Matava, K. Eck, W. Totty, R. W. Wright, and R. A. Shively
Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Tool to Predict Meniscal Reparability
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1999; 27(4): 436 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
T. Muellner and C. L. Stanitski
Correlation of arthroscopic and clinical examinations with magnetic resonance imaging findings of injured knees in children and adolescents.
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1998; 26(5): 743 - 744.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. L. Stanitski
Correlation of Arthroscopic and Clinical Examinations With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Injured Knees in Children and Adolescents
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1998; 26(1): 2 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. BERNSTEIN
Current Concepts Review - Decision Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 1997; 79(9): 1404 - 14.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
Accuracy of Imaging the Menisci on an In-Office, Dedicated, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Extremity System*: Peter D. Franklin,{dagger} MD, Richard A. Lemon,{ddagger}{section} MD, and Howard S. Barden,||a PhD
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1997; 25(3): 382 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. A. Gilula, P. R. Manske, Y. Yin, W. Shannon, D. Kirschenbaum, S. Sieler, D. Solonick, D. M. Loeb, and R. P. Cody
Correspondence
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 1997; 79(2): 312 - 3.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.