AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Howell, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Howell, S. M.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 23:616-625 (1995)
© 1995 SAGE Publications

Arthroscopic Findings Associated with Roof Impingement of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft

Bruce M. Watanabe, MD

University of Texas Medical Branch, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Galveston, Texas

Stephen M. Howell, LTC, MC, USAFR

Clinical Investigation Facility (CIF), David Grant Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, California

Nineteen patients with roof impingement of an anterior cruciate ligament graft had their grafts inspected during second-look arthroscopy. The diagnosis of roof im pingement was suspected from the clinical findings of an effusion, extension deficit, recurrent instability, or an terior knee pain. The diagnosis was confirmed when a portion of the tibial tunnel was anterior to the tibial in tersection of the slope of the intercondylar roof on a lateral roentgenogram of the fully extended knee. Dur ing second-look arthroscopy the impinged anterior cru ciate ligament graft had one or more of the following features: fractured bundles, guillotined remnants at the tibial insertion, parallel fragmentation of an uninter rupted graft, fibrous nodule, or an extrusion of graft ma terial at the outlet of the notch. We hypothesize that these changes in the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament graft are caused by mechanical injury from roof impingement.

Clinical Relevance. One should suspect that a patient with an effusion, extension deficit, recurrent instability, or anterior knee pain after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may have roof impingement. A lateral roentgenogram in full extension is diagnostic if the tibial tunnel is anterior to the intercondylar roof. The surgeon should be aware that impinged grafts can have a variety of arthroscopic appearances in addition to the previ ously reported fibrous nodule or Cyclops lesion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. M. Howell and K. W. Lawhorn
Gravity Reduces the Tibia When Using a Tibial Guide That Targets the Intercondylar Roof
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2004; 32(7): 1702 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. M. Bradley, A. G. Bergman, and M. F. Dillingham
MR Imaging of Cyclops Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 719 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.