AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharkey, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Marder, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sharkey, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Marder, R. A.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 23:270-275 (1995)
© 1995 SAGE Publications

The Rotator Cuff Opposes Superior Translation of the Humeral Head

Neil A. Sharkey, PhD

Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, California

Richard A. Marder, MD

Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, California

To determine the influence of rotator cuff muscle activity on humeral head migration relative to the glenoid during active arm elevation we studied five fresh cadaveric shoulders. The shoulder girdles were mounted in an apparatus that simulated contraction of the deltoid and rotator cuff muscles while maintaining the normal scapulothoracic relationship. The arms were abducted using four different configurations of simulated muscle activity: deltoid alone; deltoid and supraspinatus; del toid, infraspinatus, teres minor, and subscapularis; and deltoid, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor, and subscapularis. For each simulated muscle configura tion the vertical position of the humeral head in relation to the glenoid was determined at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of abduction using digitized anteroposterior radio graphs. Both muscle activity and abduction angle sig nificantly influenced the glenohumeral relationship. With simulated activity of the entire rotator cuff, the geo metric center of the humeral head was centered in the glenoid at 30° but had moved 1.5 mm superiorly by 120°. Abduction without the subscapularis, infraspina tus, and teres minor muscles caused significant supe riorly directed shifts in humeral head position as did ab duction using only the deltoid muscle. These results support the possible use of selective strengthening ex ercises for the infraspinatus, teres minor, and sub scapularis muscles in treatment of the impingement syndrome.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. L. Hansen, J. C. Otis, J. S. Johnson, F. A. Cordasco, E. V. Craig, and R. F. Warren
Biomechanics of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Implications for Treatment
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2008; 90(2): 316 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
D. A Nawoczenski, J. M Ritter-Soronen, C. M Wilson, B. A Howe, and P. M Ludewig
Clinical Trial of Exercise for Shoulder Pain in Chronic Spinal Injury
Physical Therapy, December 1, 2006; 86(12): 1604 - 1618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
P. W McClure, L. A Michener, and A. R Karduna
Shoulder Function and 3-Dimensional Scapular Kinematics in People With and Without Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
Physical Therapy, August 1, 2006; 86(8): 1075 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
M. K Walsworth, J. T Mills III, and L. A Michener
Diagnosing Suprascapular Neuropathy in Patients With Shoulder Dysfunction: A Report of 5 Cases
Physical Therapy, April 1, 2004; 84(4): 359 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. D. Michelson, A. J. Hamel, F. L. Buczek, and N. A. Sharkey
Kinematic Behavior of the Ankle Following Malleolar Fracture Repair in a High-Fidelity Cadaver Model
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 12, 2002; 84(11): 2029 - 2038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. Hurschler, N. Wulker, H. Windhagen, P. Plumhoff, and N. Hellmers
Medially Based Anterior Capsular Shift of the Glenohumeral Joint: Passive Range of Motion and Posterior Capsular Strain
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2001; 29(3): 346 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
L. Z. Payne, X.-H. Deng, E. V. Craig, P. A. Torzilli, and R. F. Warren
The Combined Dynamic and Static Contributions to Subacromial Impingement: A Biomechanical Analysis
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1997; 25(6): 801 - 808.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.