|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
Hughston Clinic, Columbus, Georgia
Hughston Clinic, Columbus, Georgia
Open rotator cuff repair has shown reliable results in terms of pain relief and improved shoulder function. Re cently, however, arthroscopically assisted rotator cuff repair has shown promising preliminary results. We compared the results of these two procedures with re gard to pain, function, range of motion, strength, patient satisfaction, and return to previous activity. Thirty-seven rotator cuff repairs were evaluated in 36 patients with a minimum followup of 2 years. The open repair group comprised 20 shoulders with an average followup of 3.3 years; the arthroscopically assisted repair group com prised 17 shoulders with an average followup of 3.2 years. Overall, the open repair group had 80% good- to-excellent results and 88% patient satisfaction, and the arthroscopically assisted repair group had 85% good-to-excellent results and 92% patient satisfaction. Shoulder flexion and abduction strength, the size of the tear repaired, and the functional outcome did not differ significantly between the two groups. In general, how ever, small and moderate-sized tears (<3 cm) had bet ter functional outcome with arthroscopically assisted re pair. The arthroscopically assisted repair group was hospitalized 1.2 days less and returned to previous ac tivity an average of 1 month earlier. In the surgical treat ment of symptomatic complete rotator cuff tears, arthro scopically assisted rotator cuff repair is as effective as open repair.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Lafosse, R. Brozska, B. Toussaint, and R. Gobezie The Outcome and Structural Integrity of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair with Use of the Double-Row Suture Anchor Technique J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2007; 89(7): 1533 - 1541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Anderson, M. Boothby, D. Aschenbrener, and M. van Holsbeeck Outcome and Structural Integrity After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using 2 Rows of Fixation: Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2006; 34(12): 1899 - 1905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Morag, J. A. Jacobson, B. Miller, M. De Maeseneer, G. Girish, and D. Jamadar MR Imaging of Rotator Cuff Injury: What the Clinician Needs to Know. RadioGraphics, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 1045 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Ma, L. Comerford, J. Wilson, and C. M. Puttlitz Biomechanical Evaluation of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs: Double-Row Compared with Single-Row Fixation J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2006; 88(2): 403 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Mazoue and J. R. Andrews Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears in Professional Baseball Players Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2006; 34(2): 182 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Boileau, N. Brassart, D. J. Watkinson, M. Carles, A. M. Hatzidakis, and S. G. Krishnan Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Tears of the Supraspinatus: Does the Tendon Really Heal? J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2005; 87(6): 1229 - 1240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. O'Holleran, M. S. Kocher, M. P. Horan, K. K. Briggs, and R. J. Hawkins Determinants of Patient Satisfaction with Outcome After Rotator Cuff Surgery J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2005; 87(1): 121 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hata, S. Saitoh, N. Murakami, H. Kobayashi, and K. Takaoka Atrophy of the Deltoid Muscle Following Rotator Cuff Surgery J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2004; 86(7): 1414 - 1419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Galatz, C. M. Ball, S. A. Teefey, W. D. Middleton, and K. Yamaguchi The Outcome and Repair Integrity of Completely Arthroscopically Repaired Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2004; 86(2): 219 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yamaguchi, W. N. Levine, G. Marra, L. M. Galatz, S. Klepps, and E. Flatow Transitioning to Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: The Pros and Cons J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 17, 2003; 85(1): 144 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yamaguchi Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair : An Updated Perspective J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2001; 83(5): 764 - 772. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Hersch and N. A. Sgaglione Arthroscopically Assisted Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repairs: Functional Outcome at 2- to 7-Year Follow-up Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2000; 28(3): 301 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Y. Park, W. N. Levine, G. Marra, R. G. Pollock, E. L. Flatow, and L. U. Bigliani Portal-Extension Approach for the Repair of Small and Medium Rotator Cuff Tears Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2000; 28(3): 312 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. P. WARNER and P. E. GREIS Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - The Treatment of Stiffness of the Shoulder after Repair of the Rotator Cuff*{{dagger}} J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 1997; 79(8): 1260 - 9. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |