AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cosgarea, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by DeHaven, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cosgarea, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by DeHaven, K. E.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 23:87-92 (1995)
© 1995 SAGE Publications

Prevention of Arthrofibrosis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Central Third Patellar Tendon Autograft

Andrew J. Cosgarea, MD

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Wayne J. Sebastianelli, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Kenneth E. DeHaven, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York

A retrospective analysis was performed to explain the decreasing incidence of postoperative arthrofibrosis of the knee in 191 consecutive patients who had anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the central third patellar tendon from 1987 through 1991. Follow-up data were available on 188 patients (98%). Age, sex, time interval from injury, preoperative motion, and concomi tant meniscal repair or partial meniscectomy were evaluated for their significance as risk factors. Twenty- two of 188 patients (12%) developed arthrofibrosis; the incidence was lower when the acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was delayed at least 3 weeks from the injury, and when preoperative extension was 10° or better. Age, sex, preoperative flexion, and need for concomitant meniscal surgery were not risk factors. The postoperative motion protocol evolved during the study period. Group 1 patients were braced in 45° of flexion for 1 week before passive extension was al lowed. In Group 2, motion was started after 48 hours. Group 3 patients were braced in full extension, with mo tion starting within 24 hours. With these changes, the incidence dropped from 23% to 3%. Decreases in the incidence of arthrofibrosis with modifications in opera tive technique and postoperative analgesia were not statistically significant.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. L. Busam, M. T. Provencher, and B. R. Bach Jr
Complications of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Constructs: Care and Prevention
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2008; 36(2): 379 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
D. Magit, A. Wolff, K. Sutton, and M. J. Medvecky
Arthrofibrosis of the Knee
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2007; 15(11): 682 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. D. Beynnon, R. J. Johnson, J. A. Abate, B. C. Fleming, and C. E. Nichols
Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Part I
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2005; 33(10): 1579 - 1602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. S. Kocher, J. R. Steadman, K. Briggs, D. Zurakowski, W. I. Sterett, and R. J. Hawkins
Determinants of Patient Satisfaction with Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 3, 2002; 84(9): 1560 - 1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. P. McHugh, T. F. Tyler, M. G. Browne, G. W. Gleim, and S. J. Nicholas
Electromyographic Predictors of Residual Quadriceps Muscle Weakness after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2002; 30(3): 334 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
P. J. Millett, T. L. Wickiewicz, and R. F. Warren
Motion Loss after Ligament Injuries to the Knee: Part I: Causes
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2001; 29(5): 664 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. R. Bach Jr, M. E. Levy, J. Bojchuk, S. Tradonsky, C. A. Bush-Joseph, and N. H. Khan
Single-Incision Endoscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Autograft: Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up Evaluation
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1998; 26(1): 30 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. B. FRANK and D. W. JACKSON
Current Concepts Review - The Science of Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1997; 79(10): 1556 - 76.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. D. Barber-Westin, F. R. Noyes, and M. Andrews
A Rigorous Comparison Between the Sexes of Results and Complications After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1997; 25(4): 514 - 526.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. A. Heier, D. R. Mack, J. B. Moseley, R. Paine, and J. R. Bocell
An Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Middle-Aged Patients
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1997; 25(4): 527 - 532.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. D. Shelbourne, D. V. Patel, and D. J. Martini
Classification and Management of Arthrofibrosis of the Knee after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1996; 24(6): 857 - 862.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.