|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
We performed a retrospective review of a series of knee arthroscopic procedures that were completed using lo cal, general, or regional anesthesia to evaluate the ef ficacy of these anesthetic techniques. Operative time, complications or failures, procedures successfully per formed, recovery room time and postoperative stay, and patient satisfaction were recorded. Local anesthesia with intravenous sedation compared favorably with the other techniques: operative time was not increased, a large variety of operative procedures were successfully completed, recovery time was significantly shortened, and patient satisfaction remained high. This technique offers several advantages over other types of anesthe sia for knee arthroscopy, including improved cost ef fectiveness.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Jacobson, M. Forssblad, L. Weidenhielm, and P. Renstrom Knee Arthroscopy with the Use of Local Anesthesia--An Increased Risk for Repeat Arthroscopy?: A Prospective, Randomized Study with a Six-Month Follow-up Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2002; 30(1): 61 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ben-David, P. J. DeMeo, C. Lucyk, and D. Solosko A Comparison of Minidose Lidocaine-Fentanyl Spinal Anesthesia and Local Anesthesia/Propofol Infusion for Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2001; 93(2): 319 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. N. Butterfield, S. K.W. Schwarz, C. R. Ries, L. G. Franciosi, B. Day, and B. A. MacLeod Combined pre- and post-surgical bupivacaine wound infiltrations decrease opioid requirements after knee ligament reconstruction Can J Anesth, March 1, 2001; 48(3): 245 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |