AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Finerman, G. A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Finerman, G. A. M.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 23:50-53 (1995)
© 1995 SAGE Publications

Local Anesthesia for Knee Arthroscopy

Efficacy and Cost Benefits

Matthew S. Shapiro, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California

Marc R. Safran, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California

Heber Crockett, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California

Gerald A. M. Finerman, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California

We performed a retrospective review of a series of knee arthroscopic procedures that were completed using lo cal, general, or regional anesthesia to evaluate the ef ficacy of these anesthetic techniques. Operative time, complications or failures, procedures successfully per formed, recovery room time and postoperative stay, and patient satisfaction were recorded. Local anesthesia with intravenous sedation compared favorably with the other techniques: operative time was not increased, a large variety of operative procedures were successfully completed, recovery time was significantly shortened, and patient satisfaction remained high. This technique offers several advantages over other types of anesthe sia for knee arthroscopy, including improved cost ef fectiveness.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
E. Jacobson, M. Forssblad, L. Weidenhielm, and P. Renstrom
Knee Arthroscopy with the Use of Local Anesthesia--An Increased Risk for Repeat Arthroscopy?: A Prospective, Randomized Study with a Six-Month Follow-up
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2002; 30(1): 61 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Ben-David, P. J. DeMeo, C. Lucyk, and D. Solosko
A Comparison of Minidose Lidocaine-Fentanyl Spinal Anesthesia and Local Anesthesia/Propofol Infusion for Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2001; 93(2): 319 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
N. N. Butterfield, S. K.W. Schwarz, C. R. Ries, L. G. Franciosi, B. Day, and B. A. MacLeod
Combined pre- and post-surgical bupivacaine wound infiltrations decrease opioid requirements after knee ligament reconstruction
Can J Anesth, March 1, 2001; 48(3): 245 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.