|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, New York Orthopaedic Hospital, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York
Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, New York Orthopaedic Hospital, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, New York Orthopaedic Hospital, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, New York Orthopaedic Hospital, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, New York Orthopaedic Hospital, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, New York Orthopaedic Hospital, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, New York Orthopaedic Hospital, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York
Nine fresh-frozen, human cadaveric shoulders were el evated in the scapular plane in two different humeral rotations by applying forces along action lines of rotator cuff and deltoid muscles. Stereophotogrammetry deter mined possible regions of subacromial contact using a proximity criterion; radiographs measured acromio humeral interval and position of greater tuberosity. Con tact starts at the anterolateral edge of the acromion at 0° of elevation; it shifts medially with arm elevation. On the humeral surface, contact shifts from proximal to dis tal on the supraspinatus tendon with arm elevation. When external rotation is decreased, distal and poste rior shift in contact is noted. Acromial undersurface and rotator cuff tendons are in closest proximity between 60° and 120° of elevation; contact was consistently more pronounced for Type III acromions. Mean acro miohumeral interval was 11.1 mm at 0° of elevation and decreased to 5.7 mm at 90°, when greater tuberosity was closest to the acromion. Radiographs show bone- to-bone relationship; stereophotogrammetry assesses contact on soft tissues of the subacromial space. Con tact centers on the supraspinatus insertion, suggesting altered excursion of the greater tuberosity may initially damage this rotator cuff region. Conditions limiting ex ternal rotation or elevation may also increase rotator cuff compression. Marked increase in contact with Type III acromions supports the role of anterior acromioplasty when clinically indicated, usually in older patients with primary impingement.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A Nawoczenski, J. M Ritter-Soronen, C. M Wilson, B. A Howe, and P. M Ludewig Clinical Trial of Exercise for Shoulder Pain in Chronic Spinal Injury Physical Therapy, December 1, 2006; 86(12): 1604 - 1618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D Borstad Resting Position Variables at the Shoulder: Evidence to Support a Posture-Impairment Association Physical Therapy, April 1, 2006; 86(4): 549 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Koel, K. M Johansson, L. E Adolfsson, and M. O. Foldevi Anti-impingement Therapy? Physical Therapy, January 1, 2006; 86(1): 143 - 144. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Park and C. S. Ahmad Dynamic Contributions of the Flexor-Pronator Mass to Elbow Valgus Stability J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2004; 86(10): 2268 - 2274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W McClure, J. Bialker, N. Neff, G. Williams, and A. Karduna Shoulder Function and 3-Dimensional Kinematics in People With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome Before and After a 6-Week Exercise Program Physical Therapy, September 1, 2004; 84(9): 832 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Reagan, K. Meister, M. B. Horodyski, D. W. Werner, C. Carruthers, and K. Wilk Humeral Retroversion and Its Relationship to Glenohumeral Rotation in the Shoulder of College Baseball Players Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2002; 30(3): 354 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M Ludewig and T. M Cook Alterations in Shoulder Kinematics and Associated Muscle Activity in People With Symptoms of Shoulder Impingement Physical Therapy, March 1, 2000; 80(3): 276 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fees, T. Decker, L. Snyder-Mackler, and M. J. Axe Upper Extremity Weight-Training Modifications for the Injured Athlete: A Clinical Perspective Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1998; 26(5): 732 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Z. Payne, X.-H. Deng, E. V. Craig, P. A. Torzilli, and R. F. Warren The Combined Dynamic and Static Contributions to Subacromial Impingement: A Biomechanical Analysis Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1997; 25(6): 801 - 808. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. U. BIGLIANI and W. N. LEVINE Current Concepts Review - Subacromial Impingement Syndrome J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 1997; 79(12): 1854 - 68. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |